My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012364
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
1665
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545638
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012364
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2020 1:37:27 PM
Creation date
5/5/2020 12:15:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012364
RECORD_ID
PR0545638
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005998
FACILITY_NAME
UNION OIL SS#2859
STREET_NUMBER
1665
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
13702031
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1665 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
301
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENSR ; <br />' The nearest well to the site is a USGS water monitoring well located approximately 800 feet northeast <br /> (downgradient)of the site The well's submersible pump is approximately 160 feet bgs (AGS, 1990) <br /> Telephone conversations with the USGS regarding this well determined that USGS wells are generally <br /> installed for monitoring and not water supply purposes Given the depth of the regional productive interval <br /> and the predominance of clay deposits in the overlying stratigraphic units, it is ENSR's opinion that there is <br /> no strong connection between the site and the aquifer from which local water supply wells withdraw their <br /> water <br />' 3.2 Sensitive receptors survey <br /> ENSR conducted a sensitive receptors survey for the site and surrounding area to identify such things as <br />' schools, hospitals, drinking water supplies that could be affected by conditions at the site The data was <br /> obtained through the services of Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR), in Milford, CT in two reports <br /> which are included in Appendix A These reports are titled EDR Offsite Receptor Report (Inquiry Number <br />' 01640841 2r) and EDR GeoCheck®Report(Inquiry Number 01640841 1 r) <br /> According to the information provided by EDR, there are approximately 21,022 people living in a one-mile <br /> radius of the site, including 44 institutions— 11 day care centers, three medical centers, six nursing homes, <br />' 15 schools, six hospitals, two colleges, and one arena Within a '/4-mile radius of the site there are two <br /> institutions—the EI Dorado Elementary School (approx 118 mile south in a crossgradient location) and the <br /> Grace United Methodist Head Start Daycare (approx '/4 mile southwest in an upgradient location) Refer to <br /> EDR's Receptor Map within the Offsite Receptor Report of Appendix A for more detail <br /> Nine water wells were identified with a '/4 mile radius of the site Eight wells are located southwest and <br /> upgradient of the site in very close proximity to one another These eight water wells include three irrigation <br /> wells, one destroyed well, two active treated water wells, and two active raw water wells <br /> The-eghth-well (EDR ID # USGS 3221904) is located northeast and downgradient of the site That well is <br /> identified as a single well with a depth of 405 feet and a well depth of 400 feet It is unknown from the EDR <br /> report if the USGS well is a drinking water well or not ENSR contacted the USGS and consulted the <br /> Department of Water Resources website regarding the well and its purpose The well was not listed as a <br /> drinking water or irrigation well, and a contact at the USGS stated that wells belonging to them are generally <br /> not used for production, but for monitoring purposes (DWR, 2006) Refer to EDR's Physical Setting Source <br /> Map within the GeoCheckO Report of Appendix A for more detail <br /> 3.3 Contaminant distribution to soil <br /> Soil samples have been collected from the site by others during the excavation of the former USTs and the <br /> advancement of the numerous soil borings both on-site and off-site During the removal of the former USTs <br /> in 1983, approximately 1,100 to 1,350 cubic yards of soil was excavated and removed from the Site As <br /> stated previously in Section 2 2, post-excavation soil sample results from the former gasoline USTs cavity <br /> reported residual levels of TPH (maximum of 18 ppm), benzene (maximum of 1 72 ppm), toluene <br /> (maximum of 5 01 ppm), ethylbenzene (maximum of 0 58 ppm), and total xylenes (maximum of 3 83 ppm) <br /> These maximum concentrations were detected in sidewall soil samples Concentrations in the soil samples <br /> from the bottom of the excavation were less <br /> Soil sampling and analysis performed during the advancement of well NP-1 (east of the former eastern <br /> pump island) in January 1999 and boring B-5 (immediately south of the former eastern pump island) in <br /> January 1988 reported residual concentrations of TPHg and BTEX in soil at these locations The impacted <br /> soil at boring B-5 was in the vadose zone at depths of 15 5 and 20 5 feet bgs, while the impacted soil at well <br /> 3-2 06 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.