Laserfiche WebLink
Page 1 of 1 <br /> Nuel Henderson [EH] <br /> From: Nuel Henderson [EH] <br /> Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 10:00 AM <br /> To: 'Kirk Larson' <br /> Cc: Vicki McCartney [EH]; 'Jim Barton'; 'Tim Cuellar' <br /> Subject: 2402 Pacific Avenue Stockton, Claim Number 757 <br /> Kirk, <br /> Your recent 5-year review recommendation for this site was closure consideration. The main remaining issue with <br /> the site is some deeper water contamination that appears to be persistent. Groundwater in shallow wells <br /> screened variably between 20 and 50 feet bsg are nearly all nondetect at this time, although a down-gradient well <br /> did contain low TPHg and TEX concentrations recently. Two wells in an intermediate depth zone screened <br /> variably between 40 and 70 feet bsg are impacted with moderate concentrations of TPHg and TEX. Three wells in <br /> a multi-chamber casing screened in deeper zones (95-100 feet, 125-130 feet and 145-150 feet bsg)are all <br /> impacted by low concentrations of TPHg and BTEX. I suspect that because the concentrations of the analytes in <br /> the three wells are nearly the same and track together over time that we are seeing some type of communication <br /> between the three or between each well and an unrecognized impacted zone. The presence of benzene suggests <br /> the contaminants are from depths greater than 70 feet bsg. <br /> The lateral extent of the deeper impacted groundwater has not been fully delineated and there is a municipal well <br /> approximately 645 feet down-gradient of the site and there are no intervening data points between the site and <br /> the municipal well. The impacted groundwater in the shallower intermediate zone well does have some down- <br /> gradient coverage by MW3 and possibly MW-4, the deeper intermediate zone well does not have down-gradient <br /> coverage. <br /> Contaminant concentrations in soil samples appear to decline to the total depth sampled and analyzed, and the <br /> concentrations in deeper samples may represent cross contamination from shallower impacted groundwater. The <br /> vertical extent of impacted soil I adequately delineated. <br /> The more impacted intermediate zone wells are in the former UST area, and intuitively, may well represent the <br /> most intensely impacted soil and groundwater. It would appear that the contaminant mass, although not <br /> calculated for the deeper zones, would not be sufficient to impact the municipal well. The EHD will issue a <br /> directive letter to the responsible party to prepare and submit a site closure summary report that provides a <br /> professional evaluation of the risks posed by the deeper impacted soil and groundwater and a fate and transport <br /> model. <br /> The shallow zone soil and groundwater issues appear to be adequately addressed; confirmation soil boring did <br /> not encounter impacted soil, monitoring well samples, with the recent exception of MW-4, have gone to <br /> nondetect, and soil gas samples were nondetect. <br /> Nuel Henderson <br /> 11/4/2010 <br />