Laserfiche WebLink
• 31 October 2003 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0173 <br /> Page 4 of 8 <br /> 3 2 COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF VAPOR EXTRACTION AIR FLOW SAMPLES <br /> Between 20 March 2003 and 23 June 2003, a total of three pairs of extracted air flow vapor samples <br /> were collected from the influent and effluent of the SVE unit to measure concentrations of <br /> hydrocarbon vapor Air flow samples were not collected during the 20 March 2003 monthly <br /> monitoring event due to SVE operations being temporanly suspended for repairs and maintenance <br /> The air flow vapor samples were collected in Tedlar bags using a hand air-vacuum pump Following <br /> sample collection,the samples were properly labeled,placed in a covered container and transported <br /> under chain-of-custody to McCampbell Analytical Inc (MAI)in Pacheco, California Each sample <br /> was analyzed within 72 hours of collection for TPH-g, BTEX and MTBE in accordance with EPA <br /> Methods 5030/8015M Modified and 8020 <br /> 4.0, FINDINGS <br /> Ground water elevation, flow direction and gradient were determined from field data collected on <br /> 24 June 2003, the contaminant impact to ground water was quantified from the laboratory analysis <br /> iFrom field and laboratory data collected at the SVE remediation system between 20 March 2003 and <br /> 23 June 2003, AGE determined the average TPH-g concentration, the average flow rate and <br /> calculated the approximate mass and volume of hydrocarbons removed <br /> 41 GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT <br /> During the June 2003 ground water monitoring event, depths to ground water ranged between 27 25 <br /> and 29 87 feet below the tops ofwell casings,ground water elevations were calculated to be between <br /> 18 63 feet(MW-8)and 19 93 feet(MW-5)below mean sea level Ground water elevation at the site <br /> decreased an average 0 10 feet between the April 2003 and the June 2003 ground water monitoring <br /> events <br /> The ground water elevation data for the June 2003 ground water monitoring event is depicted in <br /> Figure 3 Ground water flow direction at the site was inferred to be oriented east across the site, at <br /> approximate graaients of 0 002 ft/1-t or less, or approximately 11 feet per mile <br /> 42 LABORATORY RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> A total of nineteen ground water samples were submitted to CAL for analysis TPH-g was detected <br /> in ground water samples collected from wells MW-I through MW-4,MW-6,MW-9,MW-1 3(A and <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />