Laserfiche WebLink
' 20 August 2003 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0173 <br />' Page 7of8 <br /> changes of recharge/discharge of the local ground water could greatly modify ground water <br />' flow direction <br /> • The increase of ground water elevation of approximately 2 59 feet between December 2002 <br /> and April 2003 is probably due to seasonal fluctuation <br /> • Ground water at the site was approximately between 10 feet and 30 feet above the screen <br />' intervals (drowned) of wells AW-lA, AW-1B, AW-2A and AW-2B and may not yield <br /> samples fully representative of shallowest ground water conditions, ground water was <br /> between 65 and 115 feet above the screen intervals of multi-level well MW-13(A-C),which <br />' was designed to collect ground water representative of deep ground water conditions The <br /> ground water elevation appeared to be within or near the screen intervals of all other wells <br /> at the site and should be representative of shallowest ground water conditions <br />' • Ground water elevation data collected on 04 April 2003 suggests that ground water <br /> mounding may have occurred in the area of wells MW-3, MW-4 and AW-2 due to a <br />' combination of air sparging and an increase in SVE influent air flow at the site <br /> • The elevated concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons detected in samples collected from <br /> wells AW-1 and MW-4 indicate that these wells are within the dissolved petroleum <br />' hydrocarbon "core area" of the plume (Figures 4), however, signifiant decreases were <br /> reported in the samples collected from wells MW-3 and AW-2 which were probably <br /> displaced due to the affect of ground water mounding <br /> • Previous and current laboratory results of ground water samples suggest that there is a minor <br /> MTBE- and 1,2-DCA-impact to ground water in the areas of wells MW-2 through MW-5 <br />' and AW-2A (Tables 3 and 4) <br />' Based on SVE remediation data collected between 17 December 2002 and 20 March 2003, AGE <br /> concludes <br />' • The average SVE inlet vapor concentration was approximately 307 µg/1, the average SVE <br /> inlet flow rate was approximately 110 cubic feet per minute (Table 6) <br /> • The volume of hydrocarbons extracted by the SVE system was calculated to be <br /> approximately a3 gallons of petroleum hydrocarbons (Appendix F) during the December, <br /> January, February and March monitoring periods (Table 7) <br /> • Since initiation of the SVE system, the total volume of petroleum hydrocarbons extracted is <br /> estimated to be approximately 1,591 gallons (Table 7) <br /> • No general concentration trends were evident in the PID field measurements, however, <br /> laboratory analytical results were generally lower compared to the aid and 4' quarter 2002 <br /> monitoring periods <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironments],Inc <br />