Laserfiche WebLink
1 u <br />' 19 July 2002 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No 95-0173 <br />' Page 6 of 8 <br />' C =vapor concentration (kg/m3) <br /> Q = extraction flow rate (m3/hr) <br /> t = operational period, In hours <br /> Between 31 December 2001 and 29 March 2002 (first quarter), the SVE unit operated a total of <br /> 1,975 hours (Table 7) The average analytical results (approximately 627 µg/1) of the SVE air flow <br />' samples (Table 5), average flow rates (approximately 95 cfin, Table 6) and the operational period <br /> (1,975 hours)were used to calculate the approximate mass of extracted gasoline during this period <br />' During the first quarter, the mass of hydrocarbons extracted by the SVE system was calculated to <br /> be approximately 441 pounds, or equivalent to a volume of 70 gallons of gasoline Added to the <br /> estimated 1,155 gallons of hydrocarb ons extracted from the SVE system since 11 Apn12000 (start- <br /> up),the total volume of hydrocarbons extracted to date is estimated at 1,225 gallons (Table 7) A plot <br /> of the cumulative volume (gallons) of hydrocarbons extracted to date is Included with Appendix E <br /> The mass/volume calculations for extracted hydrocarbons are Included with Appendix F <br /> . 5.0. CONCLUSIONS <br />' The implications from the March 2002 ground water monitoring event are as follows <br /> p €n' g <br />' • Ground water flow direction at the site was generally toward the northeast at a gradient of <br /> 0 002 ft/ft or less Due to the low gradient at the site, slight variations In ground water <br /> measurements or changes of recharge/discharge of the local ground water could greatly <br /> modify ground water flow direction <br /> • The Increase of ground water elevation of approximately 1 31 feet between December 2001 <br />' and March 2002 Is probably due to seasonal fluctuation <br /> • Ground water elevation data collected on 08 March 2002 does not suggest ground water <br /> mounding Is occurring due to air sparging at the site <br /> • Ground water at the site Is between 3 feet and 70 feet above the screen intervals (drowned) <br /> of wells MW-1 through MW-4, AW-lA through AW-2B and MW-13 and may not yield <br /> samples fully representative of shallowest ground water conditions The ground water <br /> elevation appeared to be within or near the screen Intervals of wells MW-5 through MW-12 <br /> and should be representative of shallowest ground water conditions <br /> 1 • The elevated concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons detected in samples collected from <br /> wells MW-3, MW-4, AW-1 and AW-2 Indicate that these wells are within the dissolved <br /> petroleum hydrocarbon "core area" of the plume (Figures 4 and 5) <br /> • <br />' Advanced Geo Environmental,Inc <br />