Laserfiche WebLink
' 01 October 2004 <br /> AGE-NC Protect No 95-0173 <br />' Page 7of10 <br />' Q = extraction flow rate (m3/hr) <br /> t =operational period, in hours <br /> Between 24 March 2004 and 22 June 2004 (second quarter 2004), the SVE unit operated a total of <br /> 2,160 hours (Table 6) The average analytical results (approximately 93 µg/1) of the influent SVE <br /> air flow samples(Table 5),average flow rates(approximately 74 scfm,Table 6) and the operational <br />' period(2,160 hours) were used to calculate the approximate mass of extracted gasoline during this <br /> period <br />' During the second quarter 2004 operational period,the mass of hydrocarbons extracted by the SVE <br /> system was calculated to be approximately 56 pounds, or equivalent to an approximate volume of <br /> 9 gallons of gasoline Added to the estimated 1,929 gallons of hydrocarbons extracted from the SVE <br />' system since 11 April 2000(start-up),the total volume of hydrocarbons extracted to date is estimated <br /> at 1,938 gallons (Table 7) A plot of the cumulative volume (gallons) of hydrocarbons extracted to <br /> date is included in Appendix G The volume/mass calculations for extracted hydrocarbons are <br /> fincluded as Appendix H <br /> 4 0 CONCLUSIONS <br /> IThe implications from the 06 July 2004 ground water monitoring event are as follows <br /> • Ground water flow direction at the site was generally oriented east-northeast across the site <br />' with a gradient as great as 0 005 ft/ft Due to the generally low gradient at the site, slight <br /> variations in ground water measurements or changes of recharge/discharge of the local <br /> ground water could greatly modify ground water flow direction <br />' • The decrease of ground water elevation of approximately 1 54 feet between the 19 March <br /> 2004 and the 06 July 2004 monitoring events is probably due to seasonal fluctuation <br />' • Ground water at the site was significantly above (drowned) the screen intervals of wells <br /> AW-1 (A and B), AW-2 (A and B) and MW-13 (A, B and C) and yield samples more <br /> representative of deeper ground water conditions The ground water elevation appeared to <br /> be within or near the screen intervals of all other wells at the site and should be <br /> representative of shallowest ground water conditions <br /> • Ground water elevation data collected on 06 July 2004 does not suggest that ground water <br /> mounding may have occurred due to the on-going IAS activities <br /> • The elevated concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons detected in samples collected from <br /> wells MW-4(screened 30 to 50 feet),AW-lA(screened 39 to 44 feet)and AW-1B(screened <br /> 50 to 60 feet bsg) indicate that these wells are within the remaining dissolved petroleum <br /> Ihydrocarbon "core area" of the plume (Figure 4) <br /> Advanced GeoEnvsronmental,Inc <br />