Laserfiche WebLink
' 04 February 2004 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0173 <br />' Page 8 of 10 <br />' • BTEX and MTBE by EPA Method 8021B, and <br /> • MTBE, TAME, DIPE, ETBE and TBA by EPA Method 8260B <br /> 33 1 Extracted Water Analytical Results <br /> The results of the laboratory analysis detected TPH-g in all three grab samples at concentrations as <br /> high as 71,000 micrograms per liter(ggll), the laboratory reported all three sample chromatograms <br />' to contain unmodified or weakly modified gasoline <br /> BTEX compounds were detected in all three grab ground water samples at a concentrations as high <br />' as 13,000 µg/l xylene, from the 45-minute time Interval sample, the maximum benzene <br /> concentration was detected in the 45-minute time interval sample at a concentration of 3,900 pg/l <br /> fFuel oxygenated compounds (MTBE, TAME, DIPE, ETBE and TBA) were not detected in the <br /> analyzed samples The laboratory reports(McCampbell Analytical Inc Work Order 0307250) and <br /> chain-of-custody forms are presented in Appendix L <br /> I3 4 PURGED GROUND WATER DISPOSAL <br /> On 11 and 12 July 2003, the ground water extracted during the pumping test was pumped from the <br /> aboveground storage Baker tank Into avacuum truck(supplied by American Valley Waste OIl) The <br /> purged water was transported off-site under hazardous waste manifest to Seaport Environmental, a <br /> waste treatment facility located in Redwood City, California Documentation and uniform non- <br /> hazardous waste manifest for disposal of the pump test purged water is contained in Appendix M <br /> 4.4. SUMMARY <br /> The implications from the July 2003 aquifer ground water pumping test are <br /> • Ground `.v2.ter draw-down of at least 7 71 feet N-as obser"ed in extraction well EW-1 <br /> following 500 minutes(8 3 hours)of constant-rate pumping operation at 5 GPM,in addition, <br /> ground water draw-down was observed in observation wells AW-1 at 0 39 feet, AW-2 at <br /> 0 56 feet, AW-4 at 0 29 feet, MW-2 at 0 27 feet and MW-3 at 0 35 feet (Table 3) No <br /> significant draw-down was observed in well MW-1 <br /> • Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br /> I <br />