Laserfiche WebLink
I05 May 1997 <br /> AGE-NC Protect No 95-0173 <br />' Page 10 of 29 <br />' during performance of IAS can cause the dissolved hydrocarbon plume to migrate beyond its original <br /> horizontal extent Depth to ground water measurements are summarized in Table 6 <br /> 4 2 5 Laboratory Results of Ground Water Samples <br /> p ka-V <br />' A laboratory analysis of a ground water sample collected from AW-1 reported dissolved iron and <br /> manganese at concentrations of 0 33 parts per million (ppm, reported as milligrams per liter) and 4 4 <br /> ppm,respectively Analytical results of the ground water sample are summarized in Table No 5 The <br />' laboratory report (AAL Batch Number 97-1111-010) and chain-of-custody form is presented in <br /> Appendix C Based on the guide How to Evaluate Alternative Cleanup Technologies For UST Sites <br /> (October 1994) published by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of <br /> USTs, the presence of dissolved iron (Fe") in ground water can reduce the permeability of the <br /> saturated zone soils during air sparging operations The guide further states in Exhibit VII-12 <br /> Dissolved Iron And Aar Sparging Effectiveness that concentrations of dissolved Fe" less than 10 <br /> mg/1 are acceptable concentrations for air sparging, concentrations between 10 mg/l. and 20 mg/1 <br /> would require periodic testing or periodic replacement, if concentrations were greater than 20 mg/l, <br /> then air sparging was not recommended Results of the laboratory analysis indicated that dissolved <br /> iron and manganese conditions at the site are favorable for air sparging activity <br /> 5.0. ASSESSMENT OF HYDROCARBON-IMPACTED SOIL AND GROUND WATER <br /> Between July 1996 and January 1998, eight soil borings (B1 through B8), nine ground water <br /> monitoring wells(MW-1 through MW-9),two SVE wells(VW-1 and VW-2),two IAS NAells (AW-1 <br /> and AW-2) were installed and six ground water monitoring/sampling events performed at the site <br /> to investigate the extent of hydrocarbon-impacted soil and ground water in the vicinity of the former <br /> USTs The greatest concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbon-impacted soil has been encountered <br /> at SVE well VW-2, IAS well AW-1 and soil boring B2 The greatest concentrations of dissolved <br /> petroleum hydrocarbon impacted ground water has been encountered from wells VW-1 and MW-3 <br /> Analytical results of soil and ground water samples are summarized in Tables No 1, 2 and 3 <br /> T+trnt—v S onrl F. rio ,rT nan Aral htinnlnmr Wnrl gelet-ted cnil ca�mnlP lnratiom beneath the Site in cro4S <br /> 1 .5LA a ✓ l Al V LJL✓p}VL b4}144 Ka a.KaL.i}L.rb' J+ '--- `. <br /> sectional view Figures 7 and 8 depict the estimated extent of contoured TPH-g concentrations <br /> beneath the site in cross sectional view Figure 9 depicts the estimated extent of contoured TPH-g <br />' concentrations in plan view When the data collected at the site is plotted in both plan view and cross <br /> cpptii i%"-al-L7is-;lr tbp nnnarFnt xinhimp of mi-trnh-iim ,mnartPrl snil beneath the site is anDroximately <br /> ' 14,748 cubic yard (Appendix G) <br /> .` A mass-volume calculation using the data collected during investigation of the former UST area, <br /> Advanced CcoEmiron mental,Inc <br />