Laserfiche WebLink
I05 May 1997 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0173 <br /> Page 12 of 29 <br />' of the site poses concern based on the downgradient direction from the site and the close proximity <br /> Based on the data collected from downgradient wells MW-5 and MW-7, the plume does not appear <br /> to have migrated beyond these wells Discussions with representatives from Cal Water indicated that <br /> analysis of water samples collected from Station 4 have not detected volatile organic compounds or <br /> petroleum hydrocarbon constituents <br />' 7.0. SOIL REMEDIATION ALTERNATIVES <br /> 7 1 SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION <br /> Soil vapor extraction (SVE) is a well accepted method of treatment for hydrocarbon-impacted soil, <br />' and has been used at numerous sites with an excellent rate of success The method is most effective <br /> on volatile hydrocarbons in permeable soil <br /> 711 Principles <br /> For most SVE systems, a vacuum blower is used to volatilize hydrocarbons in the vadose <br /> (unsaturated) zone and draw the vapor into extraction wells screened within the contaminant plume <br />' The hydrocarbon vapor is drawn from the wells and"treated" in one of several possible treatment <br /> units (carbon canisters, internal combustion engines, thermal oxidizers and catalytic oxidizers) Air <br /> in3ection wells may be installed outside the contaminant plume to increase air flow to the extraction <br />' unit <br /> An internal-combustion (IC) system draws the vapor stream into the carburetor system of the engine <br /> and mixes the vapor with air prior to combustion Exhaust gasses (oxides of carbon and hydrogen) <br /> are further broken down in a catalytic converter before being emitted to the atmosphere These <br /> systems require supplemental fuel, such as propane or natural gas, which can greatly increase <br /> 1 expenses as vapor concentrations decrease below levels normally required for combustion Typically, <br /> internal combustion engines work effectively where in-situ hydrocarbon concentrations approach <br /> the 40,000 parts per million - volume (ppmv) required for peak performance of the engine As <br /> concentrations decrease belmir 20,00n nnmv Qi1nn1PMPnta1 fi1PI rPgvirementS, and therefore <br /> rr... , rr......_.__. <br /> expenses,become burdensome Another disadvantage of these systems is the noise generated by the <br /> engine, however, this can be mitigated by placing the unit inside an enclosure, such as a building <br /> 1 <br /> A c.rwOn-canister -sy�.s,t.e..m... nnPrntPC by rniitinaa hvArnenrhnn vannr thMli9h activated carbon filters <br /> r,_.»._- -.1 -v r - <br /> o- <br /> where adsorption of hydrocarbons onto carbon takes place, removing the hydrocarbons from the <br /> vapor stream This type of system works best for low concentrations of hydrocarbons, but becomes <br /> expensive when high concentrations of hydrocarbon vapor necessitate frequent canister replacement <br /> Advanced GeaEmironmental,Inc <br />