My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
4511
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545641
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2020 3:06:11 PM
Creation date
5/5/2020 2:11:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
RECORD_ID
PR0545641
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0002480
FACILITY_NAME
SHOP N GO 3
STREET_NUMBER
4511
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
APN
11023011
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
4511 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
277
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LE 1 -CHECKLIST OF REQUIRED DATA <br /> FOR NO FURTRM ACTION REQUESTS AT UNDERGROUND 4K SITES <br /> Site Name and Location: Pacific Mini Mart,4511 Pacific Avenue, Stockton,San Joaquin County(Case 390570) <br /> Y I Distance to production wells for municipal, domestic, A well survey, including a field reconnaissance,identified 15 <br /> culture, industry and other uses within 2000 feet of the site. wells within 2,000 feet The nearest is 250 west <br /> (crossgradient)of the site. Based upon sampling data,no <br /> wells are threatened due to this case. <br /> Y 2. Site maps, to scale, of area impacted showing locations Contained in several reports on file. <br /> of any former and existing tank systems, excavation <br /> contours and sample locations, boring and monitoring well <br /> elevation contours, gradients, and nearby surface waters, <br /> buildings, streets, and subsurface utilities; <br /> Y1 3. Figures depicting lithology(cross section), treatment Site lithology consists of sandy silt to 35 feet,gravels to 40 <br /> system diagrams; feet, and clay generally underlain with sandy gravel to 60 feet. <br /> Treatment system diagrams in reports. <br /> N 4. Stockpiled soil remaining on-site or off-site disposal(quantity); 638 tons of impacted soil excavated and transported to <br /> Forward Landfill. <br /> Y 5. Monitoring wells remaining on-site, fate; A reported 26 monitoring wells installed over time. All monitoring wells will <br /> be property abandoned prior to formal closure per County. <br /> 6. Tabulated results of all groundwater Depth to groundwater varied from—25 feet to--55 feet below ground <br /> elevations and depths to water, surface(bgs). The groundwater gradient varied from 0.004 to 0.02. The <br /> downgradient groundwater flow direction has been to the northeast. <br /> 7. Tabulated results of all sampling All data adequately tabularized in various reports, including closure report. <br /> and analyses: <br /> Detection limits for confinnation <br /> sampling <br /> Lead analyses <br /> 8. Concentration contours of contaminants found and those remaining in soil and The extent of the identified <br /> groundwater, and both on-site and off-site: contamination shown in applicable <br /> reports. <br /> 0 Lateral and Y❑Vertical extent of soil contamination <br /> Lateral and Vertical extent of groundwatercontamination <br /> 9. Zone of influence calculated and assumptions used for subsurface remediation Groundwater pump and treat and <br /> system and the zone of capture attained for the soil and groundwater remediation soil vapor extraction. <br /> system; <br /> 10.Reports/inforination FY] Unauthorized Release Form FYI QMRs(from 1993 to 2009) <br /> FY] Well and boring logs [Z PAR FRP n Other'Case Closure Report <br /> Yj 11.Best Available Technology(BAT) used or an explanation for not using BAT, Removal of USTs and natural attenuation. <br /> Y 12. Reasons why background wasris unattainable using BAT; Limited soil contamination remains on-site. <br /> Y1 13.Mass balance calculation of substance treated versus that The consultant estimates 0.15 lb's of TPHg remains in <br /> remaining; groundwater and 44.66 tbs. in soil. <br /> �, 14. Assumptions, parameters, calculations and model used in Due to depth of residual soil, and active SVE on-site, no <br /> risk assessments, and fate and transport modeling; additional vapor sampling conducted. <br /> Y 1 15. Rationale why conditions remaining at site will not adversely Groundwater concentrations continue to decline with <br /> impact water quality, health, or other beneficial uses;and many wells already at non-detect. Site no longer poses a <br /> threat. <br /> By: JIM —Comments:Due to groundwater and soil remedial efforts, confirmation sampling has shown that this site no <br /> longer poses a threat to human health and safety or to water quality. Regional Board staff concurs with San <br /> Date: Joaquin County's recommendation for issuance of a No Further Action letter. <br /> 7128109 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.