Laserfiche WebLink
Historical Background <br /> • PACIFIC MINI-MART <br /> 4511 Pacific Avenue, Stockton, California <br /> A vapor extraction test was conducted in December 1993 Since that time, ground water has risen <br /> ifrom approximately 55 feet bsg to as high as 30 feet bsg, reducing the vertical extent of the vadose <br /> zone open to the screened interval of the vapor extraction well The rise of ground water elevation <br /> has also eliminated most of the coarse-grained soil from the vadose zone, leaving predominantly <br /> fine-grained soil to contact with the reduced open screened interval of the vapor extraction well <br /> These changes can potentially drastically reduce the zone of influence of the vapor extraction well(s) <br /> and reduce the concentrations of hydrocarbon vapor recovered by the extraction process <br /> On 29 and 30 April and 01 May 1998, seven probe borings (B 13 through B 19)were advanced off- <br /> site of the subject property to collect soil and grab ground water samples as part of on-going <br /> assessment of the release of fuel hydrocarbons from the former UST facility TPH-g, TPH-d and <br /> BTEX were not detected In any of the soil samples analyzed, only the oxygenated compound MTBE <br /> was detected,at 180 micrograms per kilogram(µg/kg)in the soil sample from boring B 16 at a depth <br /> of 40 feet bsg TPH-g was not detected in any of the grab water samples collected, but TPH-d was <br /> detected In seven of the eight grab water samples at concentrations as high as 1,200 µg/1 Various <br />' BTEX compounds were detected in the grab water samples from borings B13, B14 and B17 at <br /> concentrations as high as 14 micrograms per liter(µg/1), benzene was detected only in the sample <br /> collected from boring B13 at a depth of 60 feet bsg, at a concentration of 0 61 µg/1 In addition, <br /> • MTBE was detected in seven of the eight grab ground water samples collected , at a maximum <br /> concentration of 1,400 µg/1 in sample B16-1420, and TBA was detected in sample B 13-H2OB at a <br /> concentration of 16 µg/1 <br /> On 20 March 2001 ground water extraction well EW-1 was installed at the site for performance of <br /> � gr <br /> a ground water pumping test On 27 March 2001, a twelve-hour aquifer pump test was performed <br /> at the site to assess the general ground water aquifer characteristics and to assess aquifer response <br /> to ground water extraction at a constant pumping rate utilizing well EW-1 for ground water <br />' extraction and wells MW-1,MW-2,MW-4,MW-5 and MW-6 and vapor well VW-1 as observation <br /> wells Three ground water samples were collected from the extracted ground water and purged <br /> ground water was containerized in an on-site 6,500-gallon poly tank The implications from the <br />' March 2001 aquifer ground water pumping test are <br /> • Ground water draw-down of at least 11 15 feet was observed in extraction well EW-1 <br /> following 700 minutes of continuous pumping (5 GPM), ground water draw-down was <br /> observed in well MW-5 (located 15 feet to the east) at 1 1 feet,well NI w-4(located 60 feet <br /> toward the southeast) at 0 1 feet, well MW-6 (located 50 feet toward the north-northwest) <br /> at 0 12 feet and in well vapor well VW-I (located 60 feet toward the west) at 0 06 feet <br /> • Utilizing a semi-loganthmic plot of ground water draw-down vs observation well distance <br /> to pumping well, a best-fit line can be utilized to protect a radius of influence of <br /> approxzmdtely 65 feet at 5 GPM Utilizing the Distance-Drawdown Method,atransmissivity <br /> 01 was calculated at 205 ft'/day(equivalent to 1,536 gallons per day/ft) and a storativity value <br />' was calculated at 0 054 <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental Inc <br />