My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2010 - 2012
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
1711
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231455
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2010 - 2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2023 10:33:18 AM
Creation date
5/5/2020 3:36:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2010 - 2012
RECORD_ID
PR0231455
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003612
FACILITY_NAME
Yosemite Avenue Arco AmPm
STREET_NUMBER
1711
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
Ave
City
Manteca
Zip
95336
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1711 E Yosemite Ave
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Monitoring System Certification <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> Software Version Installed: 329.00 <br /> rYes [I <br /> following checklist: <br /> No* Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> No* Is the visual alarm operational? <br /> No* Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested,and confirmed operational? <br /> No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br /> not interfere with their proper operation? <br /> No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment e. <br /> N/A operational? ( g.> modem) <br /> No* For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> N/A monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate <br /> positive shut-down? (Check all that apply) ® Sump/Trench Sensors; ®Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? ® Yes; ❑No. <br /> ® Yes gNNo <br /> For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e., no <br /> mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> fill point(s)and operating properly? If so,at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? 90% <br /> ❑ Yes* Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E,below. <br /> ® Yes* Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as d systems? Check all that a 1 <br /> ® Product y dry y ( pp Y) <br /> ® Water. if es, describe causes in Section E, below. <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Was in system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings?Attach set up reports, if applicable <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br /> *In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: Found small amount of product in the 89 STP sump due to leck detector improperly installed & loose. <br /> Corrected the problem by installing the leak dectector properly. Also, found water inside the 87& 89 fill sumps. <br /> Removed product&water from sumps. Placed product/water into a 55 gal drum. <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.