Laserfiche WebLink
ad k a µ nr 3 a a"F 4 r v .t;. a 's <br /> wggr y 6 v�.,�.. �Sr.�v. �� , <br /> nutrients required to sustain microbial growlll. Environmental factors that affect <br /> microbial activity sort! population size need to be monitored and maintained within <br /> close toleran4el. !'ln•tllCl•Site InVestlgation and feasibility stnt(lies would be required <br /> to determine the applicability of this treaunCn[technique. <br /> 2.2 GROUNIMNIT'R CONTIZOI.()I2 I""C:OV"Ry'I"" II1�II(�EJ1:5 <br /> Below is a list of groundwater control or recovery techniques employed at remediation sites: <br /> liliZatir,n/scllidil'ien inn.is a process that isol;ues contamiu:uus from the ground- <br /> water by chemically fixing the soil ut prevent further leacllirtg of the contamination. <br /> This process does nothing to treat the groundwater, but caul prevent it from getting; <br /> worse. Stabilization is aast•d mostly for large amounts of soil that have been impact- <br /> ed by metals or nonvolatile organic compounds. I Iydrocarbons such as those found <br /> in gasoline are relatively easily removed from soil either above the ground or in <br /> rablc to remove tilt: source innpacting groundwater rather than leave <br /> 111ace. it is prcle <br /> it in place. <br /> 2. Recovery wel]_tiY—s-1.�n1s arc one 01 the most conitllon methods of controlling <br /> groundwater movement. Wells :are used to manipulate tile subsurface Ilydraulie <br /> gradient by either injecting or withdrawilig water. Recovery wells can also be used <br /> to depress the groundwater level, as will be required at former Exxon RS 7-3942. <br /> The groundwater recovery wells will be pumped at a rale sufficient to denvater tine <br /> area beneath and downgr;client of the former tank flet(], allowing a vapor extraction <br /> system to effect cleanup below the present water level. <br /> 3. Catania, refers to installing;a nearly impermeable barrier on the surface of the site. <br /> The cap is designed to prevent rainfall from penetrating the vadose zone and carry- <br /> ing the hydrocarbons into the aquifer or groundwater. Again, this process does <br /> nothing to trealt tile groundwater, but can prevent it from getting worse. As with <br /> stabilization, it is preferable to remove the source of hydrocarbons that lllay be <br /> impacting groundwater rather than leave it in place. <br /> 4. Infercc for trenches are another way to recover groundwater. A trench is excavated <br /> 3 to 5 feet below the water table,and a perforated pipe is installed in the trench with <br /> a sand or gravel pack around it to promote water flow into the pipe. Groundwater is <br /> recovered from the trench in the Sa1n1C way it is front a well. Installation of the <br /> trenches is restricted by the deptll of grourtciwaler. Groundwater-,it former Exxon <br /> RS 7-3912 is presently 30 feet bclrny the ground surface, making die cast of con- <br /> struction unfavorable compared to the construction of wells. <br /> 5. Physical barriers can be placed dowrigradient of the petroleum hydrocarbon plume <br /> to temporarily arrest groundwater movement. A recovery well system is also re- <br /> quired to reduce the hydraulic gradient near file barrier; otherwise,in the absence of <br /> natural barriers the g;rotinilwater will flow around or tinder the barrier, The three <br /> types of barriers fllat (mll he eolastructed are slurry walls, grout walls, and sheet <br /> piling walls. The 101al extent of !lie petroleum hydrocarbon !Hunte has not been <br /> fully determined so the bencfits of a barrier cannot be determined at this time. It is <br /> likely though that the Cost of consti'ajuting these wallls far outweighs the benefits that <br /> could be gained by them at this sits•. <br /> .w'nw:v <br /> 5 <br />