Laserfiche WebLink
Upon completion of sample collection, the samples, along with the appropriate sample chain <br /> Of custody documents, were shipped overnight to the Quality Assurance Laboratory in San Diego, <br /> California for analysis <br /> The following section provides a discussion of the sample analytical results The actual analytical <br /> report, along with the sample chain of custody documentation forms, is included in Appendix B <br /> 40 SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> Table 2 provides a tabular listing of the analytical results for the sal samples collected at the site <br /> A brief discussion of the results is contained in the following subsections <br /> 41 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) <br /> Of the sixteen soil samples analyzed, two exhibited detectable concentrations of TPH Sample UGS, <br /> collected from the south side of the unleaded gasoline storage tank excavation bottom (Figure 3), <br /> exhibited a TPH concentration as gasoline of 785 mg/kg Sample BSS1, collected as a composite <br /> from the small excavation overburden stockpile located west of the excavation, exhibited a TPH <br /> w concentration as diesel of 367 mg/kg <br /> 42 Benzene Toluene X lene and Eth lbenzene BTX& <br /> Of the sixteen soil samples analyzed, only one sample, DSS1 exhibited no detectable concentrations <br /> for the BTX&E compounds However, with the exception of sample UGS which contain BTX&E <br /> compound concentrations of 445 mg/kg, 1 03 mg/kg, 4 58 mg/kg and 3 77 mg/kg respectively, the <br /> BTX&E compound concentrations within the soil samples collected at the site fall well below the <br /> LUFT manual recommended maximum allowable levels of 0 3 mg/kg, 0 3 mg/kg, 1 4 mg/kg and 1 0 <br /> mg/kg for Benzene, Toluene, Xylene and Ethylbenzene respectively <br /> 43 Ethylene Dibro_mide (EDB) and Total Lead CrL) <br /> Of the sixteen samples analyzed, no EDB was detected and the TL concentrations detected are <br /> within the typical background concentration range for soils in the Stockton area <br /> 5 0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Based on the visual observations conducted during the tank removal program at the 4555 Pershing <br /> Avenue site and on the analytical results for the soil samples collected during the tank removal, it <br /> appears that only two areas of concern regarding petroleum hydrocarbon residues exist The first 61- <br /> area of concern is the small stockpile of overburden soil from which sample BSS1 was collected <br /> (Figure 3) The composite soil sample collected from this stockpile exhibited a TPH as diesel <br /> concentration of 367 mg/kg The second area of concern is the portion of the excavation from <br /> which soil sample UGS was collected This soil sample exhibited a TPH as gasoline concentration ✓ <br /> of 785 mg/kg <br /> TreaTek recommends that for the first area of concern, the stockpile from which soil sample BSS1 <br /> was collected, that the stockpiled soils be treated/disposed of in accordance with regulatory <br /> requirements <br /> • <br /> 6 <br />