Laserfiche WebLink
SOH, VAPOR EXTRACTION TEST <br /> A short term soil vapor extraction pilot test was conducted on October 26, 1993 to determine <br /> the effectiveness of soil vapor extraction as a remediation technology Relevant information <br /> obtained during the testing included <br /> tsoil vacuum pressures and response characteristics <br /> vapor analytical data <br /> flow rates <br /> • estimated radius of influence from the extraction point <br />' Test Configuration <br /> The soil vapor extraction test system consisted of one extraction point (vadose well VW-1), a <br />' Sutorbilt positive displacement blower with a flow capacity of 120 cfm at over 150 inches of <br /> water, flexible PVC suction hose, a water knockout drum and two 200-Ib Granular Activated <br /> Carbon (GAC) canisters for emissions control The existing two-inch diameter monitor wells <br />' on site (MW-1, MW-2, MW-4 and MW-5) were used as vacuum monitoring points (The <br /> screened interval of MW-3 was below the current groundwater elevation and could not be used <br /> a monitoring point for the pilot test) The four vacuum monitoring points were equipped with <br />' Magnehelic gages to constantly measure vacuum pressure Sampling ports were located before, <br /> in between, and after the carbon canisters to verify that no TPH emissions were released to the <br /> atmosphere <br /> Test Procedures <br />' The soil vapor extraction test was performed on October 26, 1993 for a duration of 339 minutes. <br /> Several different extraction scenarios were run to assess the variabilities of air flow: <br /> • Vapor extraction well VW-1 was tested from start up for a duration of 36 minutes with <br /> an average blower flow rate of 30 cubic feet per minute (cfm), and an average extraction <br /> vacuum pressure in excess of 5.5 pounds per square inch (150 inches of water column) <br />' At this vacuum, groundwater was eventually pulled up into the VE well and flooded the <br /> screen interval <br /> • After water flooded VW-1, vacuum was reduced to 3 2 psi (94 in wc) with a <br /> corresponding average blower flow rate of 21 cfm The test continued for an additional <br /> 183 minutes in this configuration without any indication of flooding in the VE well. <br />' Soil vacuum readings were collected at each of the monitoring points These values are noted <br /> g g <br /> on the field data sheets included in this appendix PID readings were taken on Tedlar bag <br />' samples collected from a sample port located on the positive pressure side of the blower. PID <br /> values are also recorded on the field data sheets <br />' 1 t ioica3 1 <br /> 1 <br />