Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> I <br /> Project Number: SFB•175-0204,72 <br /> Consultant Project Number: 1600.206.44 <br /> Contract dumber. 1`146CWCO244.9•X <br /> Facility Humber: 98465 <br /> Work Order Humber: 0004918 <br /> Report Issue Data: April 17.1490 <br /> r. <br /> OA Conformance Summary <br /> Total Threshold Limit Concentration In Water <br /> 1.0 8 nk, <br /> The method blank was below the detection limit for all analytes as shown In Table 2. <br /> 2.0 LaD.iQratory Control samnla{t M, <br /> The copl.rol limits were met for all analytes In the aqueous LCS as shown in Table 3. <br /> r+ 2,p QM11bratign Verification Standards <br /> The control limits were met for all analytes In the initial calibration verifica'icn standard(I CVS) <br /> as shown in Table 5. <br /> 3 <br /> 4.0 tri ix Spike(MS2 Accurc.y <br /> Percent recovery limits were met for all analytes in the INS as shown In Table 55. <br /> w SASamD1e OuQiicate_Preclslon <br /> Relative percent difference criteria were met for the sample duplicate as shown in Table 7. <br /> 6.0 5amDle_ P�lna <br /> 6.1 Sample handling and holding time criteria were met for all samples. <br /> 6.2 There were no syceptional conditions requiring�-':lutlon of samples. <br /> c <br /> I . <br /> `—� GTEL Concord,CA Page 2 of 10 <br /> D004318.DOC <br /> LN VI4tl N4tF Y rAC <br /> LA/�NAIO41I1. IN: - <br />