Laserfiche WebLink
Vicki McCartney [EH] <br /> From: Vicki McCartney [EH] <br /> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 3:30 PM <br /> To: 'Lee, Daryl' <br /> Subject: RE: Regulatory Question re:VPH Sumps <br /> Hello Daryl, <br /> You really need to consult the tank manufacturer for guidance. Please keep in mind that whatever is proposed,the <br /> service technician must be able to get to the test plug at least yearly to show communication. I see all too often,that by <br /> the time all of the piping is installed in the sump,the service technician has a very hard time getting to the port (test <br /> plug) at the bottom of the sump. <br /> Please take this into consideration. <br /> Thank you. <br /> Vicki McCartney, Senior REHS <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department <br /> 1868 East Hazelton Avenue <br /> Stockton, California 95205 <br /> Phone: (209) 468-9852 <br /> Email: vmccartney(asicehd.com <br /> Ir9 <br /> From: Lee, Daryl [mailto:DARYL.LEE@bp.com] <br /> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 10:33 AM <br /> To: Vicki McCartney [EH] <br /> Subject: Regulatory Question re: VPH Sumps <br /> Hi Vicki <br /> I was hoping you can provide some regulatory guidance regarding VPH (AB2481) systems. As you may recall,the ARCO <br /> facility at 85 E Louise Ave, Lathrop, CA wasn't able to test communication during the Monitoring System Certification last <br /> month, since the secondary containment equipment needed to be retrofitted. <br /> In an effort to avoid this issue in the future would you be able to comment on the attached documentation of a DW <br /> Sump to advise if the equipment as-built satisfies communication testing requirements, specifically the test plugs? <br /> Thank you! <br /> Daryl Lee <br /> Retail Compliance Coordinator <br /> BP—Fuels North America <br /> 1 <br />