Laserfiche WebLink
#201 2This is the first time I've been made aware of failure to maintain alarm logs, so please excuse my <br /> inquisitiveness! As you know,the facility stores the alarm records in the Veeder-Root Monitoring Panel. Each month <br /> the DO prints out the alarm history from the panel, reviews, and provides documentations or explanation for actions <br /> taken for each alarm. It is my understanding that the facility is not required (at least by federal/state law or regulation) <br /> to keep a separate, handwritten, log of alarms if the aforementioned DO activities are performed. The regulations Title <br /> 23 CCR 2712(b) do not specify what form the alarm records must be maintained either. Does the Veeder-Root <br /> Monitoring System not satisfy the requirement to maintain alarm records? Furthermore,the associated entry in CERS <br /> (under Monitoring Plan—Recordkeeping) is presented as "Alarm Logs" and does not provide guidance or criteria. Please <br /> advise? <br /> I greatly appreciate your assistance with this. Feel free to call me to discuss or if you have any questions. Thanks in <br /> advance! <br /> Daryl Lee <br /> Retail Compliance Coordinator <br /> BP—Fuels North America <br /> 415.902.5089 <br /> From: Vicki McCartney [EH] [ma iIto:vmccartney(-Osicehd.com] <br /> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 8:54 AM <br /> To: Lee, Daryl <br /> Cc: kaylynn.rammell@belshire.com <br /> Subject: Inspection report for ARCO 06080 <br /> Hello Daryl and Kaylynn, <br /> I have appended the monitoring system certification inspection report and photos for ARCO 06080 at 85 E. Louise <br /> Avenue, Lathrop, CA for testing completed on February 1, 2017. An inspection checklist was provided to the facility clerk <br /> on the day of the inspection. The Environmental Health Department (EHD) has written the complete report which <br /> replaces the initial checklist. Please respond to this email to acknowledge that you have received this information. <br /> Please complete and submit a copy of the Return to Compliance Certification form to the EHD with a statement <br /> documenting the corrective actions that have been or will be taken for each violation, and any supporting paperwork, <br /> within 30 days of receiving this complete inspection report. <br /> Communication in the 87-, 91-, and diesel-product submersible turbine pump (STP) sumps and fill sumps, and <br /> communication in the under dispenser containments (UDCs) of the vacuum/pressure/hydrostatic (VPH) system were not <br /> tested during the inspection on February 1, 2017.Testing of these components must be completed before March 1, <br /> 2017 or they will be considered late. An inspector must be present to verify communication in the STP and fill sumps <br /> and UDCs. There will be a fee for the re-inspection at the rate of$139 per hour. <br /> Vicki McCartney, Senior REHS <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department <br /> 1868 East Hazelton Avenue <br /> Stockton, California 95205 <br /> Phone: (209) 468-9852 <br /> Email: vmccartney c-D_sjcehd.com <br /> z <br />