My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2016 - 2018
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LOUISE
>
85
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231656
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2016 - 2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2022 2:27:53 PM
Creation date
5/7/2020 9:58:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2016 - 2018
RECORD_ID
PR0231656
PE
2351
FACILITY_ID
FA0003635
FACILITY_NAME
ARCO 06080
STREET_NUMBER
85
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
LOUISE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19627010
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
85 E LOUISE AVE
P_LOCATION
07
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
410
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I will amend the inspection report and remove items 105 and 201. 1 don't know when this will happen because of my <br /> work load. <br /> Vicki McCartney, Senior REHS <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department <br /> 1868 East Hazelton Avenue <br /> Stockton, California 95205 <br /> Phone: (209) 468-9852 <br /> Email: vmccartney(o-)sicehd.com <br /> From: Lee, Daryl [ma ilto:DARYL.LEE@bp.com] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 2:39 PM <br /> To: Vicki McCartney [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: Inspection report for ARCO 06080 <br /> Thanks Vicki! <br /> As a matter of technicality, based on your response would you consider reclassifying the observation item 105 as a <br /> Violation for this inspection report? And also item 201 as well? <br /> I've noted your explanation of the CERS submittal status, thank you. <br /> Daryl Lee <br /> Retail Compliance Coordinator <br /> BP—Fuels North America <br /> 415.902.5089 <br /> From: Vicki McCartney [EH] [mailto:vmccartney@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 2:32 PM <br /> To: Lee, Daryl <br /> Subject: RE: Inspection report for ARCO 06080 <br /> Hello Daryl, <br /> I have reviewed Title 23 California Code of Regulations and have found nothing to clarify 'Visual Inspection Records'. It <br /> appears that I am the only inspector in our office who has requested that the facility change the entry to "yes" for Visual <br /> Inspection Records. I can find nothing to support changing this to "Yes" so I will not continue to have facilities change <br /> their monitoring plan based on the response in CERS for Visual Inspection Records. <br /> Just to clarify, Willy Ng "accepted" the CERS submittal but this means that our agency has received the information, <br /> much like receiving mail for the US Postal Service. Willy did not review the submittal for accuracy. <br /> Thank you, again, for bringing this to my attention. I have learned a lot through this experience. <br /> Vicki McCartney, Senior REHS <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.