My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012620
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PICARDY
>
1501
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545655
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012620
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 12:18:59 PM
Creation date
5/7/2020 12:06:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012620
RECORD_ID
PR0545655
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0009789
FACILITY_NAME
CITY OF STOCKTON FIRE STATION #6
STREET_NUMBER
1501
STREET_NAME
PICARDY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
13515001
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1501 PICARDY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
f A <br /> r <br /> NAT <br /> K 14 <br /> oft <br /> I7��ntanite seal was positioned above tie water table, 5 gallons <br /> of potable water was added as llow the backfilledtonitthe e fa <br /> ce with <br /> ,1,110 remaining annular !space w <br /> sisnd/cement slurry. The boring logs/well detail are co <br /> in Appendix Ill . <br /> 3.4 Groundwater Sampling <br /> ell �,W1 was monitored <br /> On May 2, 1990, monitoring win <br /> accordance with WaterWork' s Groundwater Monitoring by removing <br /> (Appendix V). The well was then pulusd sand: <br /> in <br /> approximately 4 well volumes (cosi ng p ment Protocol <br /> accordance <br /> with waterWork's Well Development <br /> and <br /> (Appendix V) . Groundwater parameters (Q prior 'to sample <br /> conductivity) were allowed to stabilize p <br /> collection. Water samples were then collle d Anand tial, aansported <br /> HS <br /> under chain-of-custody Protocol to APP zed for BTEX and <br /> approved laboratory. The samples were anE modified 8015, <br /> TPHD utilizing EPA methods 8020 and <br /> respectively. The analvt=cal results are summardocumentatzed in �on <br /> 2. Laboratory data meets and chain-of-custody <br /> are included in Appendix IV. <br /> of the groundwater sample indicated <br /> Laboratory results <br /> groundwater beneath the site had not been A P ctnfir confirmation <br /> former underground fuel storage tank. o <br /> 1991. Well <br /> groundwater sample was collected ca August 8,re contained in Appendix <br /> purge logs for both sampling events a <br /> V1. <br /> 4.0 CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> during the <br /> Analytical results Of runittP underground les cCdies 1 llectedstorage tank <br /> removal of a 550 g derg <br /> indicated that diesel hydrocarbons had impacted soil beneath <br /> -rhe former tank. <br /> Approximately 40 cubic yards cation and disposed of under <br /> contaminated soils were <br /> excavated from the former tank loc <br /> authorization from the APCD and SJCPHS. <br /> including public <br /> Excavation proceeded untilrev prevented fursite bthersenlargemen of the <br /> and private thoroughfaressp les collected <br /> pit. Analytical results of confirmation same <br /> from the excavation indicated that some impacted soils as well as the <br /> southern walls, the <br /> in place on the eastern and soutand 6) <br /> It is <br /> center floor of the excavationroximately 105yards of.affected <br /> estimated that 44 gallons app <br /> 5 <br /> srs6R815.wp <br /> i• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.