Laserfiche WebLink
Mr.James Barton <br /> ' August 7,2002 <br /> Page 5 <br /> . groundwater were measured, and the groundwater was visually observed for color, turbidity, and the <br /> ' presence of floating chemical product. Physical parameters were recorded on water sample field data <br /> sheets included in Appendix A. <br /> Upon removal of the appropriate purge volume, stabilization of the measured parameters, and allowing <br /> water level recovery to 80% of the static level; samples were collected from each well using a dedicated <br /> disposable PVC bailer. Groundwater samples were decanted into prelabeled laboratory-supplied <br /> ' glassware, placed in an ice-filled cooler, and transported under chain-of-custody documentation to STL <br /> San Francisco of Pleasanton, California, a state-certified analytical laboratory. Second Quarter 2002 <br /> groundwater samples were analyzed for TPHg and TPHd by EPA Method 8015 Modified. Laboratory <br /> analytical reports and chain-of-custody records are included in Appendix B. <br /> Results of quarterly groundwater monitoring activities for the Second Quarter 2002 are summarized with <br /> historical results in Table 1. <br /> ' Groundwater Elevations <br /> ' A groundwater elevation contour map based on the June 26,2002 groundwater elevation data is presented <br /> as Figure 3. During the June 26, 2002 monitoring event, groundwater elevations ranged from—12.03 to <br /> 2.53 feet relative to mean sea level (msl). The maximum groundwater elevation change between the <br /> ' Fourth Quarter 2001 event and the June 26, 2002 monitoring event was an increase of 1.35 feet in well <br /> MW-3. Historical groundwater sounding data is summarized in Table 2. <br /> N Interpretation of the groundwater elevation contour map during the Second Quarter 2002 indicates <br /> groundwater flow is directed away from Potato Slough towards the southeast under an average hydraulic <br /> gradient of approximately 0.08 feet per foot (ft/ft). This groundwater flow pattern is consistent with <br /> ' historical monitoring data as shown in Table 3. <br /> Free Product Monitoring and Removal From Well MW-3 <br /> ' Marina personnel continued to monitor and change the hydrophobic hydrocarbon absorbent sock in well <br /> MW-3 on an approximate biweekly basis to provide continuous absorption and removal of free product. <br /> The absorbent material removes free phase petroleum hydrocarbons while dissolved phase contaminants <br /> ' attenuate naturally. Visual observations of the groundwater color prior to installing the absorbent socks <br /> have been noted as being yellow and murky; however, after installation of the absorbent socks Marina <br /> personnel have observed the groundwater to be generally clear. No free product was observed floating on <br /> ' the groundwater surface during the Second Quarter 2002. <br /> Second Quarter 2002 Analytical Results <br /> ' Groundwater analytical results for the Second Quarter 2002 are summarized on Table 1 and displayed <br /> graphically on Figure 4. TPHd was detected in wells MW-3 and MW-4 at respective concentrations of <br /> ' 2,600 and 720 micrograms per liter (ug/1). TPHg was reported at a concentration of 130 ug/l in the <br /> sample from well MW-3, and was not detected above the reporting limit of 50 ug/L in well MW-4. <br /> ' Comparison to Historical Analytical Results <br /> The concentrations of TPHd reported in wells MW-3 and MW-4 represent an increase since the last <br /> monitoring event conducted in December 2001, but are well below historical maximum concentrations <br /> ' 1ATower Park\QMR\2002 QMR\Q2-2002\2nd QTR 2002.dcc SECOR Intemational Inc. <br />