Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> lie 11 June 2002 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 96-0249 <br /> IPage 4 of 6 <br /> MW-1,MW-2, MW-4 and MW-6 at concentrations as high as 83 µg11 In addition, the oxygenated <br /> fuel additive TBA was detected in water samples collected from MW-1 and MW-2 at concentrations <br /> of 36 4g/l and 39µg/1, respectively No other oxygenated fuel additives were detected in the ground <br /> water samples <br /> Laboratory analysis of the sample collected from domestic drinking water well DW-1 did not detect <br /> Iany constituents of concern above laboratory reporting limits <br /> Previous and current analytical results of ground water monitoring well samples are summarized in <br /> Tables 3 and 4, analytical results of the ground water samples collected from the domestic drinking <br /> water well DW-1 are summarized in Table 5 The laboratory reports (MAI Work Order <br /> No 0203514) and chain-of-custody forms are presented in Appendix C <br /> 4.0. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> The implications from the March 2002 ground water monitoring event are as follows <br /> P �' g <br />�• a Ground water elevation data was generally inferred to be toward an east-west-trending <br /> depression of the water table extending from the east side of Flag City Chevron through the <br /> domestic well at the Three B's Truck Plaza(Figure 3) Ground water gradients range from <br /> approximately 0 002 ft/ft around Flag City Chevron to 0 01 ft/ft around Three B's Truck <br /> Plaza <br /> IDue to the low gradient at the site, slight variations in ground water measurements or <br /> changes of recharge/discharge of the local ground water could greatly modify the inferred <br /> ground water flow direction <br /> • Ground water flow direction at the site may have been influenced by pumping of domestic <br /> water well DW-1 <br /> • The ground water elevation at the site was within the screened intervals of wells MW-1 <br /> through MW-6 which should yield samples fully representative of shallow ground water <br /> conditions <br /> • Ground water elevation at the site increased an average 4 08 feet between the December 2001 <br /> and the March 2002 ground water monitoring events (Table 1) <br /> I • The lateral extent of the dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon plume is not known toward the <br /> south, southwest and west of the area bound by wells MW-1 through MW-6, the vertical <br /> Iextent on the site is not known(Figures 4, 5 and 6) <br /> • The elevated petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations detected in water samples collected from <br />' Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br /> I <br />