FIELD DOCUMENTS - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

FORJ\ ih& CIRCL&K #08671 /PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY Page 1 of I View r LTCP CIIeC (IISt _ O GEOTRACKER HOME MANAGE PROJECTS ISI SEPRCIII Locohrr FORMER CIRCLE-K #08671/PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY (70607700828) - MAP THIS SITE OPEN - VERIFICATION MONITORING 8606 THORNTON RDEANUP OVERSIGHT AGENCIES STOCKTON , CA 95209 ACTIVITIES REPORT SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY LOP (LEAD) - CASES 2261 SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY PUBLIC VVEBPAGECASEWORI(ER: NARUMAINOLL - SUPERVISOR: ADRIENNEELLSAESSER CENTRAL VALLEY RWOCB (REGION 5S) - CASE S: 391006 VIEW PRINTABLE CASE SUMMARY FOR THIS SITE CASEWORKER: JAMES BARTON - SUPERVISOR: BRIAN NEWMAN CUP Claim S: 19208 Assigned: D um Pald: .W THIS PROJECT WAS LAST MODIFIED BYHARLINRNOLL ON & 201311:1GISAM UFH3TORy THIS SITE HAS SUBMITTALS. CLICK BPRE TO OPEN A NEW WINDOW WITH THE SUBMITTAL APPROVAL PAGE FOR THIS SITE. CLOSURE POLICY THIS VERSION IS IN PROGRESS AS OF 513112013 CHECKLISTINITIATED ON 5/31/2013 CLOSURE POLICY HISTORY General Criteria - The site satisfies the policy general criteria - CLEAR SECTION ANSWERS YES a. Is the unauthorized release located within the Berson area of a public water s stem? Name of Water System : lCeyofstocieurn IJ' YES r NO E, The unauthorized release consists only of PetroleumIJ Mo). IIT YES C NO c. The unauthorized ("primary') release from the UST system has been stopped. fs YES r NO J. Free product has been removed to the maximum extent practicable Jam. diip�filn Not Encountered r YES f NO e. A Conceptual site model that assesses the nature, extent, and mobility of the release has been developetlLintel. 0" YES r NO E Secondary source has been removed to the extent practicable finfol. r- YES C NO g. Soil or groundwater has been tested for MTBE and results reported in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 25296.15, r Not Required rA' YES C NO h. Does a nuisance exist, as defined by water Code section 13050. C YES IF NO 1. Medli Specific Criteria: Groundwater - The contaminant plume that exceeds water quality objectives is stable or decreasing in areal extent, and meets all of the additional charectedstics of one of the five classes of sites listed below. - CLEAR SECTION ANSWERS EXEMPTION - Soil Only Case (Release has not Affected Grountlwater - Ir�fo) r YES g"O Does the site meet any of the Groundwater specific criteria scenarios? r YES C NO 1.1 - The Contaminant plumet exceeds water quality objectives is <100 feirrn length. There is no free product. The nearest existing water supply well or / surface water body is >250 fffbm the defined plume boundary. r YES VNO 1.2 - The contaminant plume that exceecjs,water quality objectives is <250 feet in length. There is no free product The nearest existing water supply well or surface water body is >1 ,000 feet from defined plume boundary. The dissolved concentration of benzene is <31000 pg/L. The dissolved concentration of r YES rV pl0 MTBE is <11000 pg/L. 1 .3 - The Contaminant plume that exceeds water quality objectives is <250 feet in length. Free product has been removed to the maximum extent practicable, may still be present below the site where the release originated, but does not extend of�ff-site. The plume has been stable or decreasing for a y minimum of five years. The nearest existing water supply well and/or surface water body is >1 ,OPMeet from the defined plume boundary. The Property r YES I NO owner Is willing to accept a land use restriction Ifthe regulatory agency requires a land use restriction as a Condition for closure. 1A - The contaminant plume that exceeds water quality objectives Is <1,000 feet in length. There is no free product. The nearest existing water supply well or surface water body is >1,ODO fei f j ern the defined plume boundary. The dissolved concentrations of benzene and MTBE are both <11000 PgIL r YES NO 1 .5 -The regulatory agency determines, based on an analysis of site specific Conditions, that the site under current and reasonably anticipated near-tens I- firture scenarios, the Contaminant plume poses a low threat to human heath and safety and to the environment and water quality objectives will be achieved rC `YES C NO within a reasonable time frame. 2. Media Specific Criteria: Petroleum Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air - The site is considered /ow-threat for the vaporintmsion-to-airleathwayifsite- YES specific condifions Safisfy items 2a, 2b; or 2c - CLEAR SECTION ANSWERS 3. Media Specific Criteria: Direct Contact and Outdoor Air Exposure - The site is considered low-threat for direct contact and outdoor air exposure YES ifitmeet5 1, 2, Or3 below. - CLEAR SECTION ANSWERS EXEMPTION - The upper 10 feet of soil is free of petroleum contamination r YES r NO Does the site meet any of the Direct Contact and Outdoor Air Exposure Criteria scenarios? r YES r NO 3.1 - Maximum Concentrations of petroleum constituents in soil are less than or equal to those listed in the following table JLM for the specified depth r YES r NO below ground surface. Additional Information SPELL CHECK ' Save In Progress LOGGED IN AS HENDERSONN CONTACT GEOTRACKER HELP https :Hgeotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/regulators/screens/closure_policy .asp?global_id=TO. . . 6/28/2013