Laserfiche WebLink
TA 1 ; CHECKLIST OF REQUIRED TA <br /> FOR NO FURTHER ACTION REQUESTS AT UNDERGROUND TANK SITES <br /> Site Name and Location: Pacific Bell, 10 E. 12th Street,Tracy,San Joaquin County <br /> 0 1. Distance to production wells for municipal, domestic, agriculture, A sensitive receptor survey in 4/03 reported one <br /> industry and other uses within 2000 feet of the site; private well 600 feet southwest and three municipal <br /> supply wells 650 feet north of the site. <br /> 0 2. Site maps, to scale, of area impacted showing locations of former and existing tank One 500-gallon heating oil UST <br /> systems, excavation contours and sample locations, boring and monitoring well elevation . and one 2,000-gallon diesel <br /> contours, gradients, and nearby surface waters, buildings, streets, and subsurface utilities; <br /> UST were removed 2/02 and <br /> 3/02, respectively. <br /> 3. Figures depicting lithology(cross section), treatment system diagrams; Site lithology consists of clay. The total depth <br /> investigated was 23 feet. <br /> 4. Stockpiled soil disposed off-site (quantity); An unspecified amount of soil was excavated and reused as backfill <br /> onsite. <br /> F 7Y 5. Monitoring wells remaining on-site, fate; <br /> Three monitoring wells(MW-1 to MW-3), installed for this investigation, will <br /> be properly abandoned. <br /> 0 The depth to water is 10 feet. The groundwater flow F <br /> 6. Tabulated results of all groundwater elevations and depths fo water, <br /> —�--- �-�.=,_ —_ -- ---� —<direction-varied-from-north-to-southwest--_--� <br /> FY 7. Tabulated results of all sampling and analyses: Maximum soil boring results in 3/02 reported TPHd(5 mg/kg), In 9/02, <br /> additional soil analyses reported TPHd(2.7 mgtkg). Groundwater <br /> ® Detection limits for confirmation sampling maximum grab sample from 3/02 reported'TPHd(390 Ng/L). In 10/03, <br /> Y Lead analyses groundwater samples reported ND for all constituents, including MtBP. <br /> 0 8. Concentration contours of contaminants found and those remaining in soil The extent of contamination is defined by <br /> d groundwater, both on-zitp and off-site: soil borings and groundwater monitoring <br /> Y Lateral and Y Vertical extent of soil contamination wells. <br /> Lateral and Vertical extent of groundwater contamination <br /> N� 9. Zone of influence calculated and assumptions used for subsurface Based on the limited extent of soil and <br /> remediation system and the zone of capture attained for the soil and groundwater contamination, an engineered <br /> groundwater remediation system; remediation system was not required at <br /> this site. <br /> 0 10.Reports/information Y❑ Unauthorized Release Form QMRs, 7/03 to 10/03 <br /> Boring logs Y❑ PAR E FRPY❑ Other Site Conceptual Model(7/02) Closure Report(2/04) <br /> 11.Best Available Technology(SAT) used or an explanation for not using BAT, Remove UST and natural attenuation. <br /> 12.Reasons why background was/is <br /> unattainable using BAT Minor soil contamination remains on-site. <br /> Q13.Mass balance calculation of substance <br /> treated versus that remaining; Mass balance was not estimated. <br /> i <br /> 14.Assumptions,parameters, calculations and model used in risk <br /> assessments, and fate and transport modeling;and A risk assessment was not required. <br /> FE15. Rationale why conditions remaining at site will not adversely Soil contamination is limited in extent, and based on <br /> impact wafer quality, health, or other beneficial uses. 2 ND quarterly sampling events, contamination is not <br /> leaching to groundwater. Groundwater monitoring <br /> shows no impact to Water Quality. <br /> By: Comments: One 500-gallon heating oil UST and one 2,000-gallon diesel UST were removed 2/02 and 3/02, respectively. <br /> JL,B Multiple borings and three monitoring wells were completed in 2003, to delineate contamination at this site. Maximum soil <br /> boring results in 3/02 reported TPHd(5 mg/kg)- In 9/02, additional soil analyses reported TPHd(2.7 mg/kg): <br /> Date: Groundwater maximum grab sample from 3/02 reported TPHd(390 pg/L). in 10/03, groundwater samples reported ND <br /> for all constituents, including MtBF. Based on the limited extent of soil contamination and two quarters of groundwater <br /> 3/3/04 analysis, which show no impact to groundwater, Board staff concur with San Joaquin County's Closure Recommendation. <br />