Laserfiche WebLink
1 croplands" are both defamatory on their face and by implication in that they suggest that there i <br /> 2 data proving that the source of nitrates in and around the Lima Ranch property is caused by Lim <br /> 3 Ranch's dairy operation. Lima Ranch is unaware of any data that conclusively shows that Lim <br /> 4 Ranch is the primary source of such contamination. <br /> 5 23, The Fact Sheet also falsely implies that the California Regional Water Quality <br /> 6 Control Board-Central Valley Region ("RWQCB") is investigating Lima Ranch in that i <br /> 7 requests Lima Ranch's neighbors "To assist the Water Board ... to act quickly in response to the <br /> 8 contamination" by providing information to Charlene Herbst, Unit Chief, and Pamela Creedon <br /> 9 Executive Officer, of the RWQCB. It further provides contact information for both Ms.Herbs <br /> 10 and Ms. Creedon. <br /> 11 24. The Fact Sheet further misleadingly accuses Lima Ranch of creating a sever <br /> 12 health hazard by stating that data shows that the levels of nitrogen in the groundwater is a <br /> 13 "levels more that 10 times the California Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) established <br /> 14 by the Department of Health Services" and that "[t]he MCL is the amount of nitrate that, i <br /> 15 exceeded may cause adverse health affects [sic]." (Emphasis in original). <br /> 16 25. The MCL established by the California Department of Health Services onl <br /> 17 establishes a level that is safe for drinking water. 22 CCR § 63341. The Fact Sheet misleading) <br /> 18 and falsely asserts that exceeding the MCL alone can cause adverse health effects withou <br /> 19 clarifying that it will only have such effects if the water is consumed or ingested. <br /> 20 26. These false and misleading statements were published to third parties including <br /> 21 but not limited to Plaintiff's neighbors. <br /> 22 27. It is clear from reading the Fact Sheet that the false and misleading statement <br /> 23 were made about Lima Ranch. <br /> 24 28. On information and belief, these third parties understood the false and misleadin <br /> 25 statements to be about Lima Ranch, Jack Hamm, and Patricia Hamm. <br /> 26 29. On information and belief, these third parties understood that the statement <br /> 27 meant that Lima Ranch was operating in an unlawful manner so as to cause severe groundwate <br /> C= 28 pollution in the region which could have severe adverse health effects. On information an <br /> HERUt�.CRABTREE <br /> . 5 <br /> COMPLAINT FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER,PRELIMINARY AND PERMANENT <br /> INJUNCTION,LIBEL PER SE,AND LIBEL PER QUOD <br />