Laserfiche WebLink
Case 2:07-cv-00660-J4*1-EFB Document 50 Filed 000/2008 Page 5 of 5 <br /> 1 Ranch's cows, the feed-mix information, the dairy operations in the milking process, and the <br /> 2 types of pesticides and herbicides applied at the ranch. The court approves and endorses that <br /> 3 agreement. Such information shall not be used outside the confines of this litigation. The results <br /> 4 of the soil, water and sediment testing are not subject to the terms of that limited protective <br /> 5 order. <br /> 6 Finally, to the extent the parties have further disagreements or issues regarding the <br /> 7 inspection following the first day of"reconnaissance," (i.e.,the experts' on-site evaluation of the <br /> 8 property for purposes of adjusting the work plan), they shall have forty-eight hours to meet and <br /> 9 confer before the testing begins. In accordance with the foregoing, plaintiff's motion to compel <br /> 10 the inspection of land is granted. <br /> 11 Plaintiff seeks the reasonable expenses incurred in making these motions. See Fed. R. <br /> 12 Civ. P. 37(a)(5). Because plaintiffs motion has been granted and defendants' denied, the court <br /> 13 will order defendants to pay plaintiff's reasonable expenses incurred in these motions. Plaintiff <br /> 14 may submit an affidavit detailing those expenses within ten days from the date of this order. The <br /> 15 award is subject to the court's approval. <br /> 16 SO ORDERED. <br /> 17 DATED: August 25, 2008. <br /> 18 EDMUND F. BRENNAN <br /> 19 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE <br /> 20 <br /> 21 <br /> 22 <br /> 23 <br /> 24 <br /> 25 <br /> 26 <br /> 5 <br />