My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSTALL_2011
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LOUISE
>
85
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231656
>
INSTALL_2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2022 4:43:08 PM
Creation date
5/11/2020 2:26:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
INSTALL
FileName_PostFix
2011
RECORD_ID
PR0231656
PE
2351
FACILITY_ID
FA0003635
FACILITY_NAME
ARCO 06080
STREET_NUMBER
85
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
LOUISE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19627010
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
85 E LOUISE AVE
P_LOCATION
07
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
422
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Issue Date: March 11,2008 <br /> Revision Date: October 17,2008 <br /> Leak Detection Technologies, LLC <br /> MDleak Enhanced Leak Detection Method <br /> NON-VOLUMETRIC TANK TIGHTNESS TEST METHOD(TRACER) <br /> Certification Leak rate of 0.005 gph with PD = 97.6% and PFA= 0% <br /> Leak A tank system should not be declared tight when chemical marker is detected outside of the tank system. <br /> Threshold <br /> Applicability Gasoline,diesel,aviation fuel, fuel oil #4,fuel oil #6,solvents,waste oil, liquefied petroleum gas, natural gas. <br /> Other fluids may be tested after completion of a compatibility evaluation by the manufacturer. <br /> Tank Not limited by capacity. <br /> Capacity <br /> Waiting Time Ranges from 5 to 31 days after chemical marker is added to the tank,when"Controlled Leak Points"are not used. <br /> The waiting period may be adjusted below this range when supported by"Controlled Leak Points"as described below. <br /> Controlled A"Controlled Leak Point"is a port where chemical marker is injected directly into the soil surrounding the UST to <br /> Leak Points determine the rate at which chemical marker moves. It can be used to demonstrate that the chemical marker will <br /> migrate through the soil to a detection point in a documented amount of time, as described in manufacturer's <br /> procedures. <br /> Chemical Dosage of chemical marker of either vapor, liquid or both is based on factors including tank size,tank volume, frequency <br /> Marker and volume of tank refills,and is determined according to manufacturer's procedures. <br /> Dosage <br /> Soil Soil present during the evaluation was sandy in texture,with water table 200 feet below the surface. <br /> Permeability Type of soil may have an impact on the migration of vapors. <br /> Whenever the chemical marker is used outside of the parameters of the evaluation,such as in frozen soil,"Controlled <br /> Leak Point(s)"must be used. <br /> Sampling When sampling in backfill, radius of influence of each sampling port is a maximum 16 feet. <br /> All tank surfaces must be within the zone of influence of a sampling port. <br /> Sampling can be taken within a vertical or horizontal sampling port. <br /> Sampling port installation and sample collection are conducted per EPA soil gas sampling guidance document <br /> SOP#2042. <br /> Sample Two detectors were used during the evaluation: a helium detector with minimum detection level of 2 ppm He,and a gas <br /> Analysis chromatograph with minimum detection level of 1-10 picograms. <br /> Other analytical equipment with equivalent performance capabilities may also be used. <br /> Groundwater The method was not evaluated with groundwater above the bottom of the tank. <br /> Depth to groundwater in tank excavation backfill must be determined. <br /> When the interior hydrostatic pressure of the component* being tested is less than the exterior hydrostatic pressure,the <br /> use of other test method(s) such as water ingress measurements must be incorporated. <br /> At the discretion of the regulatory agency,water ingress measuring devices may be used to supplement test method in <br /> high groundwater conditions. <br /> When the regulatory agency allows testing to be performed with groundwater abov the bottom of tanks containing <br /> water based or water soluble products,the product must be removed from the tank prior to testing. <br /> Comments *This method can be used to test single-walled components by sampling in backfill r to test the primary containment <br /> inside of secondary containment by sampling in the interstitial space. <br /> Samples are either analyzed on-site with a mobile laboratory or collected on-site an transported to the MDLeak <br /> laboratory for analysis. <br /> Evaluator indicates that the detectable leak rate can be adjusted by controlling test variables such as chemical marker <br /> concentration and test duration. <br /> Calibration of analytical instrumentation is verified daily per EPA published document SW-846,as referenced in the <br /> laboratory guidance document. <br /> Leak Detection Technologies, LLC Evaluator: Ken Wilcox Associates <br /> 1400 East Paseo Pavon Tel: (816)443-2494 <br /> Tucson,AZ 85718 Date of Evaluation: 01/07/08 <br /> Phone: (520) 207-4878 <br /> E-mail: info@LeakDetect.net <br /> URL: www.leakdetect.net <br /> http://www.nwglde.orgfevals/leak_detecfon_technologies a.html <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.