Laserfiche WebLink
and a groundwater sample was collected using the 'A-inch diameter Teflon tubing as described <br /> previously. <br />' The thud boring (83-1) was drilled to a depth of 41 feet bgs and was located along the eastern <br /> edge of the former UST excavation (Figure 3). Soil samples were prepared for laboratory <br />' submittal as in the first two borings Moderate product odor was detected in the core sample <br /> at 10.5 feet bgs and very strong product odor was detected in the core sample collected from <br /> 20 to 22 feet bgs. As in the first two borings, product odor and PID readings during <br />' headspace screening of soil samples diminished substantially below this depth. Standing water <br /> was not present in the boring after collection of core samples at 11 or 17 feet bgs The <br />' Screen-Point Sampler was used to attempt a depth-discrete sample from lb to 20 feet bgs, but <br /> no groundwater entered the screen. Water was observed to be flowing into the boring after <br /> collection of the core sample from 20 to 22 feet bgs, and a groundwater sample was collected <br />' at this depth using the slotted-screen method described above. This sample was collected <br /> within the interval of strongest soil discoloration and product odor, and very strong petroleum <br /> odors were detected within the water sample Following completion of soil sampling in boring <br />' B3-1, the three borings were grouted to the surface with neat cement per PHS/EHD guidelines <br />' Soil and groundwater samples were placed in an ice-cooled chest and submitted under chain-of- <br /> custody procedures to BSK Analytical Laboratories (BSK), a California DHS-certified <br /> laboratory for PHC analyses Samples were analyzed for BTEX, TPHg, and MTBE using <br /> EPA Methods 801518020. Since both former tanks at Site 3 contained unleaded gasoline, <br /> Carol Oz of PHS/EHD provided verbal authorization on August 7 that analysis for total lead <br /> would not be required for samples collected at Site 3 <br /> 1 <br />' 4.0 INVESTIGATION FINDINGS <br /> Findings of the investigation, including geologic and hydrologic characteristics, and analytical <br />' results of the soil and groundwater samples, are discussed in the following sections <br />' 4.1 GEOLOGIC AND HYDROLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS <br />' The site is located on the delta of the San Joaquin River, approximately 2 miles east of the <br /> confluence of the San Joaquin and Calaveras Rivers. The subsurface geology consists of a <br /> thick sequence of alluvial deposits of late Tertiary to Holocene Age, overlying sedimentary <br />' rocks of Cretaceous to Tertiary age, which in turn overlie crystalline basement rocks (Bartow <br /> and Nilsen, 1990). Data from nearby studies within the Port area indicate a soil profile to a <br />' 7 98117UNVRFTS% iUffM RPP <br /> BOYARAN & ROSS, INC <br /> Environmental Scientists & Engineers <br />