Laserfiche WebLink
respectively. Lithologic logs for these borings were made from examination of the cuttings returns <br /> at the surface(Appendix A). A portion of the cuttings were also bagged every 5 feet and screened <br /> L with a photoionization detector(PID) for volatile organic constituents(VOCs). The PID results <br /> are presented on the boring logs. <br /> Well MW5-3 is located in the northwest corner of the site providing third point for triangulation <br /> ,P g a P <br /> of the groundwater surface and monitoring groundwater along the pipeline that connected the <br /> former tanks and dispenser. Because no borings were previously drilled in this area, soil samples <br /> were collected a 5-foot intervals for geologic logging and VOC screening with the PID. No visual <br /> or olfactory indications of PHC contamination were noted in the soil samples, and all'PID readings <br /> were zero. Therefore, no soil samples from this boring were submitted to the laboratory for PHC <br /> analysis. <br /> L - 26 feet <br /> All pilot borings for the wells were drilled with 8-inch hollow stem auger to depths of about eet <br /> to allow installation of 25 feet ofwell casing. Well construction diagrams are provided in Appendix" <br /> A. Wells are constructed of about 5 feet of blank schedule 40 .polyvinyl chloride (PVC) casing' <br /> above 20 feet of 0.02-inch,factory-slotted PVC screen. All casing is threaded and rubber gasketed: <br /> Filter pack, comprising No. 3 Lonestar sand, was installed through the augers from the bottom oft <br /> I1n surface screen <br /> the boring to about 3 feet below ground su ace 2-f( eet abov . A 2-foot thick bentonite the e. ) <br /> seal, comprising Kwik-Plug Wyoming bentonite chips, was placed on top of the filter pack and <br /> Lhydrated. The upper foot of the well boring annulus was sealed with Quikcrete (a fast-setting <br /> concrete) into which the traffic-rated vaults were set. The top of the vaults were placed several <br /> inches above ground surface and the concrete is graded away from the vaults to reduce drainage It <br /> into the wells. <br /> L3.2 WELL DEVELOPMENT <br /> Development of the Site 5 wells was conducted on May 21, 1999 by West Hazmat and field <br /> L sampling and documentation was conducted by Geomatrix. 'The wells were developed through a <br /> combination of bailing, surging, and pumping. Initially, the fines that had collected in the bottom <br /> L of the well during construction were bailed out until the bailer-'reached the bottom of the well. Then <br /> the well was surged to set the gravel pack and establish communication with the formation. The <br /> bailer was then used again to remove fines from the casing and sand pack. On wells,MW5-1 and <br /> LMW5-2, the bailer was able to reduce the sand content to less than 5 milligrams per liter after <br /> removal of about 20 gallons of water, at which time a submersible pump was installed. <br /> f Development.continued until physical parameters(pH,electrical conductivity, and temperature)of <br /> b the water were stable and the water was relatively clear. A total of 66 gallons (about 20 well <br /> volumes)were removed from both MW5-1 and MW5-3 during development. At well MW5-2,very <br /> Lfine sand continued to enter the well`casing throughout development and the pump could not be <br /> installed (required a sand content less than 5 mg/1). However, a total of 84 gallons (26 well <br /> t <br /> L 5 PHILIP P. Ross, R.G. <br /> �s <br /> L <br />