Laserfiche WebLink
a <br /> 4.1 GEOLOGIC AND HYDROLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS <br /> The site is located on the delta of the San Joaquin River, approximately 2 miles east of the <br /> confluence of the San Joaquin and Calaveras Rivers.. The subsurface geology consists of a <br /> thick sequence of alluvial deposits of late Tertiary to Holocene Age, overlying sedimentary <br /> rocks of Cretaceous to Tertiary age, which in turn overlie crystalline basement rocks (Bartow <br /> and Nilsen, 1990). Data from nearby studies wifihin-the Port area indicate a soil profile to a <br /> depth of about 20 feet bgs comprised of interbedded sands and clays, mostly under reduced <br /> conditions (Sierra-Pacific Groundwater Consultants (SPGC], 1994). Lithologic data from <br /> boring B4-1 (Appendix A) indicate a predominance of very fine-grained sediments to a depth <br /> of 20 feet bgs, the maximum depth explored at the site. Soils encountered at the site comprise <br /> f mostly clay, clayey sand, and silty sand. An approximately 2-foot-thick bed of poorly-graded, <br /> fine-grained sand occurs at a depth of about 16 to 18 feet bgs (Appendix A). <br /> Data from nearby studies indicate that the current depth to groundwater in the vicinity ranges <br /> from about 5 to 10 feet bgs (SPGC, 1998, and EMCON, 1998). Seasonal fluctuations in the <br /> water table appear to range from about 3 to 5 feet, with some as much as 6 to 9 feet. Tank <br /> removal inspection records for this and other Port sites (dating back to`1987) indicate that no <br /> groundwater was encountered during excavation of the tank or soil resampling to a depth of <br /> as much as 16 feet bgs. Water levels in this area have risen as much as 8 feet since 1994, 2 <br /> to 3 feet of which appear to be attributable to the heavy and prolonged El Nino rainfalls of last <br /> winter. The water level measured in'boring B4-1 was 8.3 feet bgs on August 4, 1998. <br /> Groundwater flow directions in the vicinity of the site appear to be variable, ranging from west <br /> northwest to east southeast. Flow direction changes-may be due to tidal influences produced <br /> by the deep water channel to the north,and the San Joaquin River to the west and southwest <br /> of the Port area. <br /> 4.2 SOH. AND GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> Analytical results for soil and groundwater samples collected during this investigation are <br /> presented on Table 2. The laboratory data sheets and chain-of-custody record are included in <br /> Appendix B. No PHCs were detected in the soil or groundwater samples collected from the <br /> two borings. Additionally, no discolored soils or petroleum product-odors were noted and no <br /> f organic vapors were detected by the PID in either of the borings. <br /> 1� Table 2 indicates that total lead was detected in both soil samples from boring B4-1 and in the <br /> soil sample collected from 11.5 to 12.0 feet bgs in boring B4-2. Lead concentrations range <br /> 5 981MMVRT'r %MUSrMV.Rn <br /> BOYAJIAN & ROSS, INC. <br /> �, Environmental Scientists & Engineers <br />