Laserfiche WebLink
2 Dry Rubber 40.4 0.81 <br /> 3 Dry Rubber 37.8 0.76 <br /> 4 Dry Rubber 41.6 0.83 <br /> 5 Dry Rubber 39.4 0.79 <br /> Average 39.1 0.78 <br /> HDPE Base <br /> Test No. Surface Condition Force Applied Coefficient of Friction <br /> 1 Wet Rubber 35.5 0.71 <br /> 2 Wet Rubber 37.5 0.75 <br /> 3 Wet Rubber 38.2 0.76 <br /> 4 Wet Rubber 35.1 0.70 <br /> 5 Wet Rubber 34.4 0.69 <br /> Average 36.1 0.72 <br /> HDPE Base/Rubberized Bearing Pad(Epoxied) <br /> Test No. Surface Condition Force Applied Coefficient of Friction <br /> 1 Wet Rubber 35.7 0.71 <br /> 2 Wet Rubber 34.1 0.68 <br /> 3 Wet Rubber 33.4 0.67 <br /> 4 Wet Rubber 33.8 0.68 <br /> 5 Wet Rubber 34.1 0.68 <br /> Average 34.2 0.68 <br /> HDPE Base/Rubberized Bearing Pad(Non-Epoxied) <br /> Test No. Surface Condition Force Applied Coefficient of Friction <br /> 1 Wet Rubber 37.4 0.75 <br /> 2 Wet Rubber 37.8 0.76 <br /> 3 Wet Rubber 38.7 0.77 <br /> 4 Wet Rubber 38.3 0.77 <br /> 5 Wet Rubber 37.3 0.75 <br /> Average 37.9 0.76 <br /> From these results,it is clear that a coefficient of static friction of.053 is conservative. <br /> The lowest individual reading of any of the 60 test pulls has a coefficient of.053.This is <br /> in the case of a bare HDPE base on wet concrete.It is the understanding of this <br /> engineering firm that the bare base is never in contact with the roof.A bearing pad is <br /> always utilized. <br /> The highest average reading for a bare HDPE Base with Rubberized Epoxied Bearing <br /> Pad was 1.02 on dry concrete.The lowest average reading was.076 on wet rubber.This <br /> assembly was very consistent for all surfaces. <br /> Applying epoxy to the pad did not improve the friction factor for all ofthe utilizations <br /> that the product is likely to encounter.It is therefore recommended that the pad not be <br /> epoxied to the base.This is the typical application. <br /> Using a coefficient of static friction of.053 is conservative.Using a coefficient of.070 is <br /> recommended. <br /> Advanced Support Products, Inc. page 3 of 3 <br />