Laserfiche WebLink
u:JJ wu ��.'91V LJJ JI J4 I'ICIJ. L4ii6 <br /> To properly decommission a well, borehole, or lost drive casing in <br /> an open borehole, several considerations and complementing <br /> technical criteria should be addressed. It is important to note <br /> that each well decommissioning should be approached as a unique <br /> situation on a site-specific and case-specific basis. Also, <br /> techniques used to decommission wells with extensive Filter packs <br /> are usually always time consuming and gXpensive_ if adequate results <br /> are to be achieved. Decommissioning these types of wells can cost <br /> more than the well originally cost to install. In addition, wells <br /> with extensive filter packs are usually more subject to encounter <br /> field problems during the physical decommissioning process because <br /> the complexity of activities is always greater and more iterative. <br /> A s=pling of the most important criteria that need to be the focus <br /> of decommissioning efforts are discussed in this paper. However, <br /> it is noted that it is not possible to provide a complete listing <br /> of all techniques and technical considerations that could be used <br /> in decommissioning activities. <br /> SUMMARY OF DECOMMISSIONING ACTIVITIES <br /> overview <br /> Without exception, the best techrmI.e for decommissioning a well is <br /> to remove all well construction materials by over-drilling to <br /> create a slightly larger borehole than previously existed. The <br /> newly created borehole should then be sealed with impermeable <br /> grouting material to ground surface. During initial planning to <br /> decommission a well, ever-drilling may seem irlpractical, too <br /> expensive, and technically unwarranted. However, the integrity of <br /> this procedure to unquestionably prevent future cross contamination <br /> of water-bearing zones may provide justification for the technique. <br /> Also, if unforseen technical difficulties are considered, which <br /> almost always occur and generate increased and unbudgeted costs, <br /> over-drilling should not be automatically dismissed as an <br /> unjustifiable technique. <br /> If well construction materials are not removed by over-drilling, <br /> there are two important considerations for adequately <br /> decommissioning a well: 1) define subsurface geology penetrated by <br /> the well; and, 2) define well construction specifications. of <br /> these, subsurface geology is probably the most important criteria. <br /> Available geologic logs of borehole lithology and construction <br /> specification's should be thoroughly reviewed. sources of geologic <br /> �WJ-g iah'd t6hsts'uction diagrahs intluda the california Department of <br /> Water Rasources Fa .a ,, ggUaty %p. "t+y 1Fav*rrments, and local <br /> drilling and cansulttng cemnanies. <br /> In a sedimentary environment, essentially all emphasis of a <br /> decommissioning procedure should be placed on locating and sealinc <br /> ayaitards to prevent cross contamination in the subsurface. <br /> Sealing permeable geologic materials should not be the focus of <br /> . z . <br />