My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
STOCKTON
>
942
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516727
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2020 3:51:49 PM
Creation date
5/14/2020 1:44:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0516727
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0012758
FACILITY_NAME
DIAMOND FOOD PROCESSORS OF RIPON
STREET_NUMBER
942
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
STOCKTON
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
RIPON
Zip
95366
APN
25934012
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
942 S STOCKTON AVE
P_LOCATION
05
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
505
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS -3- <br /> FOX VALLEY CORPORATION <br /> AND FOX RIVER PAPER COMPANY <br /> RIPON MILL <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> 11. The ground water model looked at the semi-perched aquifer zone, the upper aquifer zone, <br /> and an intermediate aquifer zone. The semi-perched zone had an average TDS of 938 mg/l; <br /> the upper aquifer had an average TDS of 566 mg/l; and the intermediate aquifer had an <br /> average TDS of 422 mg/l. Over a five-year period, the model predicts that TDS in the semi- <br /> perched zone will improve as a result of the lowered TDS in the plant discharge. A report <br /> discussing the effect of the discharge on TDS in the three water-bearing zones is due in 1998 <br /> and every five years thereafter. <br /> 12. Following extensive ground water modeling, the Discharger's consultant David A. <br /> Lawrence,C.E.G. 618, stated in a letter, dated 21 September 1992, that the Discharger's <br /> discharge at 1100 mg/l. is not a designated waste and will not cause degradation of the waters <br /> of the State of California beyond ambient environmental conditions. The Discharger will <br /> continue ground water monitoring to confirm that its discharge is not impacting or degrading <br /> ground water. <br /> 13. The beneficial uses of the Stanislaus River and downstream waters are municipal, industrial, <br /> and agricultural supply; recreation; esthetic enjoyment; navigation; and preservation and <br /> enhancement of fish, wildlife and other aquatic resources. <br /> 14. The beneficial uses of the ground water are municipal, industrial,and agricultural supply. <br /> 15. The Board adopted a Water Quality Control Plan,Third Edition,for the Sacramento River <br /> Basin and the San Joaquin River Basin (hereafter Basin Plan), which contains water quality <br /> objectives for all waters of the Basin. These requirements implement the Basin Plan. <br /> 16. The action to update waste discharge requirements for this facility is exempt from the <br /> provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)in accordance with Title 14, <br /> California Code of Regulations(CCR), Section 15301. <br /> 17. This discharge is exempt from the requirements of Title 23, CCR, Section 2510, et seq. <br /> (hereafter Chapter 15). The exemption,pursuant to Section 2511(b), is based on the <br /> following: <br /> a. The Board is issuing waste discharge requirements, <br /> b. The discharge complies with the Basin Plan, and <br /> C. The waste water does not need to be managed according to 22 CCR,Division 4, <br /> Chapter 30, as a hazardous waste. <br /> 18. The Board has notified the Discharger and interested agencies and persons of its intent to <br /> prescribe waste discharge requirements for this discharge and has provided them with an <br /> opportunity for a public hearing and an opportunity to submit their written views and <br /> recommendations. <br /> 19. The Board, in a public meeting,heard and considered all comments pertaining to the. <br /> discharge. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.