Laserfiche WebLink
PAGE 4 OF 11 <br /> X if X if Pg X if X if X if requirement <br /> not in RWD N more info cmnts <br /> waived (Class <br /> RWD sufficient <br /> needed attch'd III only) <br /> e. Location, attitude, and nature (tight, gouge-filled, <br /> etc.) of any faults <br /> f. All other structural criteria <br /> 4. Results of a testing program for determination of physical and <br /> chemical properties of soils needed to formulate site design <br /> criteria <br /> 5. a. A determination of the expected peak ground acceleration at <br /> each WMU associated with the maximum credible earthquake <br /> (class I or class 11) <br /> b. A determination of the expected peak ground acceleration at <br /> each WMU associated with the maximum Probable earthquake <br /> (class III) <br /> c. For a and b: <br /> i. Does the analysis consider local seismic conditions and <br /> faulting? <br /> ii. Does the analysis include modifications to allow for <br /> site-specific surface and subsurface conditions? <br /> iii. Is the method of analysis based on an identified <br /> procedure of publication? <br /> 6. Using the expected peak ground acceleration the stability and • <br /> factor of safety (FOS) for all embankments, cut slopes,and <br /> associated landfills during the design life of each WMU <br /> shall be calculated. The analysis shall include: <br /> a. Method used to calculate the FOS (Bishop's Method, etc.) <br /> b. Name of any computer program used to determine the FOS <br /> c. Description of the assumptions used in the stability <br /> analysis (height of fill, slope-and-bench configuration, etc.) <br /> 1. Are any of the WMUs Class 1? If so, see 2595(f)(6) <br /> 8. If the WMU is a new or expansion Class II: <br /> a. Identification of known Holocene faults underlying the landfill <br />