Laserfiche WebLink
These trends in the groundwater concentrations in the source wells maybe sufficient evidence to suggest <br /> that the dissolved hydrocarbon plume is not migrating(low risk site closure criterion#3). However, <br /> pending the discovery of an error with the initial monitoring well survey in 1991,anew downgradient well <br /> may need to be installed to define the horizontal extent ofthe plume. This well will be constructed in a <br /> similarmanner as was implemented in previous monitoring wells. Ifgroundwater flow is confirmed to be <br /> towards the southeast,WESTON recommends installing the new downgradient well on the sidewalk on <br /> the southeast comer of Sutter Street and Washington Street. <br /> 4.3.3 Vertical Extent of Groundwater Contamination <br /> According to EHD,the vertical extent of groundwater contamination in the source area at the site has not <br /> been adequately defined(EHD,2005). The monitoring well with the highest historical and current <br /> concentrations ofanalytes ofconcem is MW-2,located in the area of excavated USTs. Monitoring well <br /> MW-2A is located approximately 50 feet southwest ofMW-2 and is screened at a lower depth. This well <br /> also shows elevated levels ofTPH-g and BTEX;however,the concentrations detected are much lower <br /> than in MW-2. This suggests that contaminant levels decrease with depth. <br /> r <br /> In order to obtain a more defined picture ofthe vertical extent ofcontamination,a groundwater investigation <br /> adjacent to monitoring well MW-2 will need to be performed. The investigation would involve collecting <br /> depth discrete groundwater grab samples at 10 foot depth intervals from the top ofthe water table to 90 <br /> feetbgs and submitting the samples for TPH-g and BTEX analysis. It is anticipated that contamination will <br /> no longer be detected at this depth. <br /> r <br /> The samples will be collected using a hollow stem auger drill rig and hydropunch groundwater sampler. <br /> Soil samples will be collected from the boring at 5-foot intervals using a California-modified split spoon <br /> sampler and logged in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System,American Society for Testing <br /> and Materials(ASTM)Number D2487-92. Soil samples will be screened with a Photoionization Detector <br /> (PID)for organic vapors,and selected soil samples will be submitted to the laboratory for TPH-g and <br /> BTEX analysis. Groundwater samples will be collected with a disposable polyvinyl chloride(PVC) <br /> hydropunch screen and stainless steel bailer. <br /> A 2-inch diameter groundwater monitoring well will be installed in the boring after collecting the soil and <br /> ` groundwater samples. Well construction will be determined by the on-site geologist,depending on the <br /> lithology, PID measurements, and any staining or odors encountered. The monitoring well will be <br /> developed at least 48 hours after installation and groundwater samples will be collected from the completed <br /> well on the quarterly schedule for monitoring at the site. <br /> In addition,ithasbeen discovered that the bottom ofmonitoring well MW-2 has silted in by approximately <br /> 8 feet,as the bottom of the well was measured down to 45.5 feet bgs initially and is now measured at <br /> 37.60feetbgs. While the well development rig is present on site,this well mayrequire redevelopment, <br /> ` which essentially consists ofcleaning the borehole and casing ofdrilling fluid to properly settle the gravel <br /> 15 <br /> r <br />