My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010361
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SUTTER
>
145
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0543041
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010361
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 3:45:11 PM
Creation date
5/18/2020 2:55:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0010361
RECORD_ID
PR0543041
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0024604
FACILITY_NAME
HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY
STREET_NUMBER
145
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
SUTTER
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
14912016
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
145 S SUTTER ST
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> Final Baseline Human Health Risk Assessment <br /> San Joaquin Human Services Agency Building <br /> IDecember 2001 <br /> • 0 Contaminant loss from leaching downward does not occur <br /> 1 <br /> • Source degradation and transformation is not considered (e g , biodegradation, <br />' hydrolysis, etc ) <br /> • Concentration at the soil particle surface/soil pore air space interface is zero <br />' • Convective vapor flow near the building foundation is uniform <br />' • Contaminant vapors enter the building through cracks and openings in the walls <br /> and foundation at or below grade <br /> • Convective vapor flow rates decrease with increasing contaminant source- <br /> building distance <br />' • All contaminant vapors directly below the building will enter the building, unless <br /> the floor and walls are perfect vapor barriers This implies that a constant pressure <br /> field is generated between the interior spaces and the soil surface and that the <br />' vapors are intercepted within the pressure field and transported into the building <br /> This assumption is inherently conservative in that it neglects periods of near zero <br /> pressure differential (e g , during mild weather when windows are left open) <br />' • • The building contains no other contaminant sources or sinks and represents a well <br /> mixed air volume It therefore neglects contaminant sinks and the room-to-room <br />' variation in vapor concentration due to unbalanced mechanical and/or natural <br /> ventilation <br />' 3.0 INDOOR AIR MODELING <br /> A risk-based analysis was conducted for the indoor air pathway using guidance that was <br /> Idownloaded from the national United States Environmental Protection Agency (U S EPA) <br /> Superf ind Risk Assessment WEB site The address for this website is as follows <br /> http //www epa gov/oerrpage/superfund/programs/risk/ <br /> IThis guidance was developed to address concerns raised about the potential for adverse impacts <br /> to indoor air quality from contamination in subsurface groundwater and soil In response to this <br /> Iconcern, EPA developed a series of risk-based spreadsheets (and a User's Guide) that allow for <br /> site-specific application of the Johnson and Ettinger Model (1991) The user's guide is titled <br /> User's Guide For The Johnson and Ettinger (1991) Model For Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Into <br /> Buildings (Revised) It was prepared by Environmental Quality Management, Inc for submittal <br /> I <br /> ISan Joaquin County GW Monitoring Report2(Appendix D)v 2 2 12/27/2001 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.