Laserfiche WebLink
MEMORANDUM <br /> CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD - CENTRAL VALLEY REGION <br /> 3443 Routier Road Phone: (916) 361-5600 <br /> Sacramento, CA 95827-3098 ATSS: 8-495-5600 <br /> TO: Gary Reents FROM: John Tomko <br /> I � <br /> DATE: 26 May 1989 SIGNATUR • "tel I <br /> i <br /> SUBJECT: Southwest Hide Investigations <br /> Moldenhauer Engineering Company submitted, on 17 May 1989 , the <br /> additional information that we requested on the ongoing site <br /> investigation at the Southwest Hide Company site. The additional <br /> investigations planned for the potential soil contamination site, the <br /> abandoned wells, and the existing brine handling system all appear <br /> sufficient. <br /> The pump test will be preceded by slug tests on several existing wells. <br /> The consultant ' s plan is to assess the data from these slug tests and <br /> the results of the abandoned well investigations in order to design a <br /> pump test that would maximize the use of existing wells. A full scale <br /> pump test is scheduled for early June. <br /> The consultant does not agree with our recommendation that an additional <br /> deep (140 ft. ) monitoring well be installed adjacent to monitoring well <br /> #2 . He argues that the deep well proposed adjacent to the existing <br /> monitoring well cluster #7 and #7A, will provide information necessary <br /> to determine the need and proper design for additional deep wells. <br /> The need to delineate the vertical extent of contamination is crucial <br /> in determining the remedial action for this site. The Remedial Action <br /> Plan must b2 sub.,,ittau by i August 19ts9 . The consultant acknowledges <br /> that additional deep wells may be required following the analysis of <br /> water samples from the proposed deep well, but there may not be <br /> sufficient time to install them and meet our 1 August 1989 deadline in <br /> the Cleanup and Abatement Order. <br /> Since the on-site production well is contaminated and assumed to be at <br /> least as deep as the proposed deep well, it is reasonable to assume that <br /> this 140 foot interval is contaminated. The areal extent of <br /> contamination at the water table will be sufficiently known following <br /> this next phase of the field work. However, it is unlikely that the <br /> vertical extent will be known, and this could delay the submittal of the <br /> RAP. <br /> I recommend that the assessment of the abandoned wells and the <br /> installation of the proposed deep well be given priority and that the <br />