Laserfiche WebLink
I I <br /> The Inspection Report also notes that stormwater training for an employee, Juan Ambriz (hired <br /> January 21,2019),was not provided within the first six months of hire(SWPPP training completed <br /> October 11,2019). At the time of the inspection, computer-based training records were not being <br /> properly automated for assignment. This issue was brought to the attention of Pick-n-Pull's <br /> training database administrators and has been corrected. Moving forward, automated training <br /> assignments will include stormwater training upon new hire. A copy of Mr.Ambriz's stormwater j <br /> training is provided in Attachment 4. Training records are maintained through the training <br /> software database. <br /> Hazardous Waste Disposal-#202 <br /> During the inspection,the County alleged that gravel debris,which has been profiled and classified <br /> as a non-hazardous waste by Pick-n-Pull, was improperly disposed of and should have been <br /> disposed of as a hazardous waste. Pick-n-Pull disputes this alleged violation. To properly profile <br /> and classify the waste, composite samples are collected by a qualified waste vendor and analyzed <br /> for metals, petroleum hydrocarbons, organics, and toxicity through fish bioassay analyses. The <br /> lab results were reviewed by the County during the inspection and confirm that the gravel debris <br /> does not exhibit hazardous waste characteristics. <br /> Pick-n-Pull does not believe that the sample of oily debris collected by the County during the <br /> inspection is representative of this high-volume waste stream that is periodically characterized by <br /> a qualified waste vendor to ensure its proper management. The sample collected by the County <br /> was selectively chosen from a visibly stained area on the ground rather than collecting/compositing <br /> several samples from the bin used to contain the gravel. A single "worst case" sample collected <br /> from the ground is not representative of the waste stream as a whole. Further, the sample in <br /> question contained only 10 mg/L lead,just nominally over the STLC value of 5 mg/1 and likely <br /> within background levels in the native soil. Similar questionable sampling techniques were also <br /> used by the inspectors when sampling other routinely generated wastes (e.g., used PPE and rags). <br /> Pick-n-Pull believes that its waste profiling procedures are consistent with regulatory requirements <br /> and that these waste streams are being properly characterized. <br /> i <br /> Minimizing Release of Hazardous Waste-#301 <br /> During the inspection, the County noted numerous instances of oily staining beneath vehicles <br /> located in the Customer Yard,vehicles with incomplete draining of fluid reservoirs,vehicles noted <br /> to be "actively leaking" and some vehicles with oil filters that had not been properly removed. <br /> Based on these observations, the County alleges that the Site is not maintained to minimize the <br /> release of hazardous waste or hazardous waste constituents. <br /> It is part of Pick-n-Pull's standard operating procedures (SOPS) to remove vehicle fluids such as <br /> brake fluid, power steering fluid, and windshield wiper fluid from vehicles during the Vehicle <br /> Clean Out(VCO)process,which occurs prior to placing vehicles in the Customer Yard. Oil filters <br /> are also removed from vehicles, drained and crushed as part of SOPs. Employees are trained on <br /> Page 3 of 6 <br /> Stockton Insp Resp_County_20200116 <br />