Laserfiche WebLink
Limited Groundwater Investigation 2 <br /> ■ Stockpile samples contained total extractable Cr at concentrations ranging from 12 to 42 <br /> µg/L and extractable Cr VI concentrations ranging from 9.7 to 39.9 µg/L at the French <br /> Camp facility. The stockpile samples collected from the Lathrop facility contain total <br /> extractable Cr concentrations ranging from 12 to 49 µg/L and Cr VI concentrations <br /> ranging from 9.5 to 39.8 µg/L. The total Cr and Cr VI extracts were obtained using the <br /> DIWET method. <br /> ■ Storm water samples collected at the French Camp facility on February 23, 2001 and <br /> March 5, 2001 contained concentrations of dissolved Cr VI ranging between 63 µg/L <br /> and 95 µg/L, total Cr ranging between 64 µg/L to 100 µg/L, and dissolved Cr ranging <br /> between 59 µg/L and 91 µg/L. Storm water samples collected at the Lathrop facility <br /> during the same storm water sampling events contained concentrations of dissolved Cr <br /> VI ranging between 28 and 144 µg/L, total Cr ranging between 44 and 150 µg/L, and <br /> dissolved Cr ranging between 28 and 150 µg/L. <br /> ■ Cement used at the French Camp facility contained extractable total Cr (<5 to 15 µg/L) <br /> and Cr VI (19 to 69 µg/L). The cement from Lathrop also contained extractable total Cr <br /> (36 to 53 µg/L) and Cr VI (47 to 68 µg/L). These extracts were obtained using DIWET <br /> method. In some cases, the concentration of the Cr VI found in the cement was greater <br /> then the extractable levels detected in the stockpile samples. <br /> ■ Fly ash used only at the Lathrop Facility contained extractable levels PrNVET) of total <br /> Cr and Cr VI at concentrations of 200 µg/L and 184 µg/L,respectively. The <br /> concentrations of these metals found in the fly ash were greater then the stockpile <br /> extracts. . <br /> ■ Extractable concentrations (DIWET) of total Cr and Cr VI obtained from the stockpile <br /> samples and total Cr and Cr VI concentrations found in the storm water samples at these <br /> facilities were greater than their respective PHGs for drinking water. <br /> This report presents a discussion of the groundwater sampling activities,groundwater results and a <br /> comparison of the previous data and WQGs to the groundwater results. <br /> 2.0 GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY <br /> This section describes the geologic and hydrogeologic conditions at the facilities and the <br /> surrounding area. The Lathrop facility is approximately 0.5 miles south of the French Camp facility. <br /> The following descriptions are based on published literature and the May 7 and 8, 2001, <br /> investigation at each facility. <br /> 2.1 Regional Geology and Hydrogeology <br /> The Lathrop and French Camp facilities are located about 6 miles south of Stockton, California, <br /> within the Central Valley geomorphic province. The Central Valley geomorphic province is divided <br /> into the Sacramento Valley and the San Joaquin Valley. The Central Valley is a large, northwestward- <br /> trending, asymmetric structural trough that has been filled with several miles thick of sediment <br /> (USGS 1986). The United States Geological Survey (USGS) describes the boundaries of the <br /> P:\wp\lobs\20587\LP—FCGW.doc—DCN 102300 June 2001 <br />