My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
R
>
ROTH
>
342
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0505721
>
COMPLIANCE INFO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 3:35:05 PM
Creation date
5/18/2020 3:22:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
RECORD_ID
PR0505721
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0012938
FACILITY_NAME
MONIER LIFETILE LLC
STREET_NUMBER
342
STREET_NAME
ROTH
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LATHROP
Zip
95213
APN
19603002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
342 ROTH RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TSok
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Limited Groundwater Investigation 5 <br /> California. One groundwater grab sample was collected from each sampling location using direct <br /> push/dual tube sampling methods and a low volume peristaltic pump equipped with poly tubing. <br /> Ten probe holes were advanced to first groundwater at the Lathrop and French Camp facilities on <br /> May 7 and 8, 2001,respectively. Soil cores were collected by advancing a 2.7-inch diameter steel <br /> outer casing and 1.5 inch diameter stainless steel inner-sampling rod simultaneously through the <br /> subsurface. Soil samples were collected in a 3-foot long stainless steel sample barrel lined with <br /> stainless steel sleeves. One location was sampled continuously at each facility (LP-G1 and FC-G5) to <br /> determine depth to first groundwater and to obtain a general lithologic description. The XD-1 <br /> limited access drill rig was used at the Lathrop facility, but met with outer casing refusal in a hard <br /> pan layer at approximately 12 to 16 feet bgl at LP-G1. As a result, the outer casing of the sampling <br /> unit was unable to advance past the hard pan layer. Continuous core sampling activities stopped at <br /> approximately 15 feet bgl in LP-G1 due to refusal. The smaller diameter inner rod of the sampling <br /> unit was advanced past the outer casing to a total depth of 28 feet bgl in LP-G1, and a groundwater <br /> grab sample was collected. To complete sampling activities in the remaining four locations (LP-G2 <br /> through LP-G5), soil within the upper 10 feet was sampled for lithologic logging, and the inner rod <br /> was advanced to approximately 22 to 25 feet bgl to collect a groundwater grab sample. <br /> Similar drilling methods were used at the French Camp facility at the five sampling locations (FC-G1 <br /> through FC-G5),with the exception of the size of the drill rig. A more powerful rig (SD-1) was used <br /> at French Camp to minimize the potential for outer casing refusal. Sample location FC-G5 was <br /> continuously cored to a total depth of approximately 37 feet bgl to establish the depth to first <br /> groundwater at the French Camp facility. Soil from sample locations FC-G1 through FC-G4 was <br /> collected at depths of 10, 20, and 30 feet below grade for lithologic logging.At the French Camp <br /> Facility, groundwater was encountered at approximately 29 feet bgl. <br /> To expedite sampling activities, a groundwater grab sample was collected from each sample location <br /> at both facilities by installing temporary 0.75-inch PVC screen (pre-cleaned and wrapped in plastic <br /> with a 0.010-inch screen slot size) through the inner rods. The sampling unit (outer casing and inner <br /> rods) was then removed from the borehole and the temporary screened casing was left in place. <br /> Groundwater was collected from each temporary screen using an ISCO sampling devise (low <br /> volume peristaltic pump) and poly tubing. The groundwater samples were transferred directly to <br /> laboratory provided sample bottles through the tubing. <br /> Sample locations were backfilled by retraction grouting methods with a cement grout through the <br /> temporary PVC casing. <br /> Groundwater grab samples were submitted to Applied P and Ch Laboratory (APCL), located in <br /> Chino, California, and were analyzed for the following suite of parameters using USEPA SW-846 <br /> Test Methods (USEPA 1986): <br /> ■ Total and dissolved Cr using EPA Test Method 6010. <br /> ■ Dissolved Cr VI using EPA Test Method 7199. <br /> P:\wp\jobs\20587\LP FCGW.doc—DCN 1023W June 2001 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.