Laserfiche WebLink
19 October 2004 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 97-0343 <br />' Page 3 of 4 <br />' due east,respectively. Figure 3 illustrates the contoured ground water elevations as measured on 30 <br /> June 2004. <br />' 3.2. ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> TPH-g, TPH-d, BTEX, and fuel additives were not detected at or above laboratory reporting limits <br /> in the ground water samples from wells MW-5, MW-7, and MW-8. <br />' The analytical results of the water samples collected in June 2004 are summarized in Table 2. The <br /> laboratory report (CTEL Project No. CT214-0407002), quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) <br /> report, and chain-of-custody form are included in Appendix D. Documents confirming the upload <br />' of laboratory electronic deliverable format(EDF) files and depth to ground water measurements to <br /> GeoTracker are included in Appendix E. <br />' 4.0. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> Based on the data collected from the site, AGE finds: <br />' • At the time of the June 2004 sampling event,depths to groundwater in wells MW-4 through <br /> MW-8 ranged from 58.45 feet to 60.06 feet below the tops of the well casings;ground water <br /> elevations ranged from 30.18 feet below mean sea level (MSL) in well MW-4 to 31.87 feet <br />' below MSL in well MW-5 (Table 2). The average ground water elevation at the site this <br /> quarter was 31.34 feet below MSL.The average ground water elevation at the site decreased <br /> 5.34 feet between the March 2004 and June 2004 sampling events. <br />' • Ground water at the site appeared to be flowing in an east-northeast plunging trough. The <br /> southeast and northwest limbs of the trough were flowing under an average hydraulic <br /> gradient of approximately 0.038 foot/foot north-northwest and 0.006 foot/foot due east, <br /> respectively. <br /> • TPH-g,TPH-d,BTEX,and fuel additives were not detected at or above laboratory reporting <br />' limits in the ground water samples from wells MW-5, MW-7, and MW-8. <br /> • The historically hydrocarbon-impacted well MW-1 was not purged or sampled during the <br /> June 2004 monitoring event because the well was dry. <br /> • The lateral and vertical extents of the hydrocarbon-impacted ground water appear to be <br /> limited to an isolated dissolved mass above well MW-8, within the wells MW-4 to MW-7, <br /> and within the upper reaches of the upper water table,yet under depth of the dry well casings. <br /> . The nature of the water table at the site is controlled by the seasonal rase and fall of the water <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />