My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010189
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SHAW
>
1648
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545689
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010189
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 4:08:35 PM
Creation date
5/18/2020 3:45:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0010189
RECORD_ID
PR0545689
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005164
FACILITY_NAME
FISCO WAREHOUSE
STREET_NUMBER
1648
STREET_NAME
SHAW
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
00000
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1648 SHAW RD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' 20 January 2005 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 97-0343 <br />' Page 11 of 21 <br />' 9 1 3 Monitoring Activities <br /> Monitoring of vapor extraction systems involves weekly measurement of vapor concentrations at the <br />' inlet to the destruction unit and periodic service and repair Systems can be equipped with an <br /> automatic telecommunication system to alert the operator of system malfunctton or failure Vapor <br /> samples should be collected monthly for laboratory analysis to monitor the efficiency of the <br />' remediation program When the concentrations of extracted vapor have decreased and stabilized after <br /> a certain period of operation,confirmation borings are drilled to collect soil samples for quantitative <br /> analysis in the laboratory to document the degree of cleanup obtained <br /> 914 Feasibility <br />' Generally,a vacuum of at least 0 10 inches of water is required to successfully volatilize subsurface <br /> hydrocarbons The radius of influence is often considered to be the distance from the extraction well <br />' at which a vacuum of at least 0 1 inches of water is observed (EPA-A guide for Corrective Action <br /> Plan Reviewers) A vapor extraction feasibility test has been performed at the site (discussed in <br /> Section 3 0 ), and the test adequately determined that SVE would be a feasible alternative for soil <br /> remediation There also is a network of three SVE wells (dual completed as SVE and monitoring <br /> wells)already in place at the site,and due to the decrease in the ground water table these wells could <br />' also incorporate dual-zone SVE <br /> One drawback of SVE is that not all contaminated zones of soil are remediated effectively or at the <br /> I same rate For instance, a sandy soil zone will clean up more quickly than a silty one, SVE is not <br /> usually effective in soil with high clay content Other drawbacks of SVE include ineffective <br /> treatment of soil lying below ground water or within the "smear" zone and ineffective treatment of <br />' longer-chain hydrocarbons(I e ,diesel,motor oil) Though,currently soil contamination is all within <br /> the vadose zone at the site <br /> Ground water remediation should be conducted concurrently with SVE to facilitate remediation of <br /> the smear zone <br /> 915 Duration <br /> Cleanup periods for soil vapor extraction typically range from several months to several years Based <br /> upon the plume size and the presence of silt and sand rich soil, an SVE cleanup period of 6 to 12 <br /> Imonths is estimated <br /> • <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.