Laserfiche WebLink
h? p <br />' 30 June 2004 <br /> i AGE-NC Project No 97-0343 <br />' Page 3 of 6 <br />' 2 2 5 Monitoring Well Development <br /> On 05 August 2003,monitoring well MW-8 was developed utilizing a stainless steel hand bailer and <br />' a Waterra Inertia pump Approximately 6 gallons of water were removed from the well,however the <br /> well drew down while purging Ground water temperature,pH and conductivity were not measured <br /> due to the limited water removed from the well Field sheets and data are Included in Appendix C <br />' Purged water was stored on-site in properly labeled, 55-gallon DOT-approved drums <br />' 2 2 6 Well Head Survey <br /> On 26 September 2003, a California state-licensed survey engineer from Mid Coast Engineering <br />' (MCE) surveyed the location to the nearest i-centimeter and elevation at the top of the well casing <br /> of monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-8 to the nearest 0 01-foot relative to mean sea level(MSL) <br /> using coordinate datum NAD 83 (1983) and vertical datum NAVD 88 from global positioning <br />' system (GPS) observations and relative to City of Stockton Bench Mark # 191, surveyed at 32 40 <br /> feet above MSL The results of the monitoring well survey are contained in Table 1 The surveying <br /> report from MCE is presented In Appendix D <br /> 2 3 WELL MONITORING AND EVACUATION <br /> On 08 August 2003, a Solinst water level meter was used to measure the depth to ground water in <br /> monitoring wells MW-5 through MW-8 relative to the tops of the well casings Depth measurements <br /> were not possible in wells MW-1 through MW-4 because these wells had no measurable water <br /> (Appendix C) Consequently, these wells could not be purged or sampled Field sheets and data are <br /> Iincluded in Appendix C <br /> After recording water level measurements, dedicated disposable plastic bailers were used to purge <br /> wells MW-5 through MW-7 of standingwater,a Waterra inertiapump and dedicated hose bailer was <br /> used on well MW-8 Approximately 0 25, 0 5, 0 25 and 4 0 gallons of water were removed from <br /> wells MW-5, MW-6, MW-7 and MW-8, respectively, before the wells were purged dry Ground <br /> water temperature,pH and conductivity were measured at regular intervals during purging using an <br /> Oakton water analyzer Purged water was stored on-site in labeled, 55-gallon DOT-approved drum <br /> Field sheets and data are included in Appendix C <br /> I <br /> • <br /> IAdvanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />