My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FYFFE
>
305
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009011
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2020 3:01:33 PM
Creation date
5/19/2020 1:47:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0009011
PE
2954
FACILITY_ID
FA0004080
FACILITY_NAME
NAVCOMSTA
STREET_NUMBER
305
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
FYFFE
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
952035000
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
305 W FYFFE ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TSok
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
276
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Richard Powell - 3 — <br /> Drainage <br /> 3 — <br /> Drainage Channel Confirmation Report <br /> NCTS, Stockton <br /> The report states that, "Given that the soils in the drainage channels are native clays, and that 4,4- <br /> DDD, 4,4'-DDD, and 4,4'-DDT are hydrophobic, DDT total detected in the native clays of the <br /> drainage channel would most likely remain heavily sorbed onto the clays and therefore, be less <br /> likely to leach than the soils used to determine the leachable limit. In this regard, the Navy should <br /> determine the actual leachability of a representative sampling of the most contaminated sample <br /> sites. Two options are recommended for calculating the soluble fraction of pesticides in soil. There <br /> is the standard DI WET method and the USEPA recommended Sediment Quality Guidelines for <br /> Non-Ionic Organic Pollutants (see attached). <br /> 3. Ecological Receptors Analysis. The Navy should receive acceptance of their analysis by the <br /> California Department of Fish and Game or the Department of Toxics Substances Control's <br /> toxicology department with regards to the ecological risk assessment. <br /> 4. Table 2. Metals Detected in Soil. Please include the depth of the samples on the table. Results <br /> of samples DC 13, -14, and—15 are not listed on the table. Please include the results in a revised <br /> table. <br /> The Navy should respond to these comments in a revised drainage channel investigation plan to <br /> determine whether pesticides remaining in sediment/soil pose a threat to surface and groundwater <br /> quality. <br /> If you have any questions, please contact me at (916) 255-3078 or schwabk a,rb5s.swrcb.ca.Qov. <br /> KIM A. SCHWAB <br /> Associate Engineering Geologist <br /> Enclosure <br /> cc: Francesca D'Onofrio, DTSC, Region 1, Sacramento <br /> Eric Hong,DTSC, Region 1, Sacramento <br /> Charlie Huang, CA Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department, Stockton <br /> Dana Sakamoto, Environmental Program Department Manager,Naval Facilities Command <br /> (SWDIV), 1220 Pacific Highway, San Diego, CA 92132 <br /> Brad Beeman,NCTS, Stockton <br /> Jay Jahangiri, Port of Stockton <br /> Kas:NCTS DrainChanConf <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.