Laserfiche WebLink
Al Jesena - 3 - 1 March 2000 <br /> Draft RI for OU#3 <br /> NCTS, Stockton <br /> Waste Characterization <br /> The Navy has not adequately characterized wastes at the site. In the case of OU #3, landfills are the <br /> primary source of contamination. Other sources include burn areas, contaminated soil, and sediment. <br /> Characterization involves the collection of data describing the physical and chemical characteristics of <br /> wastes present in the source area. Sampling and analysis of the landfills is necessary in order to <br /> determine the type of waste and chemicals present (EPA, 1988). One of the remedies proposed is to <br /> excavate and dispose of the waste off-site. Without knowing the quality of wastes, the Navy will not <br /> able to determine the threat to water quality and the economic viability of off-site disposal (e.g., <br /> hazardous waste disposal costs vs. municipal) or the health and safety hazards associated with <br /> excavation in the Feasibility Study (FS). Without knowing the type of waste/chemical containment <br /> provided by the landfills, the Navy cannot determine the potential remedies to address future releases if <br /> the landfills are not excavated. It is necessary to know the integrity of waste/chemical containment to <br /> determine the probability of a future release, how to monitor the release, and how to respond in a timely <br /> manner. The Navy has employed all the available sources to determine the content of the landfills <br /> except actual physical sampling. <br /> We would not be inclined to allow landfills to remain in-situ without knowing the content of the <br /> trenches. One cannot predict whether a landfill will eventually be a source of contamination or continue <br /> to be a source of contamination without knowing what may leach from the trenches, which are partially <br /> inundated with groundwater. Therefore, the Navy should propose a sampling and analysis plan for <br /> definitive characterization of waste in the landfills. Please also see our comment below on the Landfill <br /> Management Approach. <br /> Determine the Nature and Extent of Contamination <br /> Results of soil WET tests show that soluble constituents of concern potential concern (COPCs) as <br /> inorganics (e.g., pesticides, metals) and organics (e.g., petroleum hydrocarbons) have leached to <br /> groundwater. Background groundwater quality for inorganics have not been determined at NCTS, <br /> Stockton, nevertheless, the Navy repeatedly states that there are no impacts to groundwater because the <br /> metai(s) found above background"do not appear to be a concern." <br /> Surface and subsurface soil sampling results show inorganics and organics are widespread across the <br /> Landfill Area and not necessarily associated with landfills or hot spots. Information is manipulated <br /> using the VLEACHSM model. The Navy has used the model as a predictive tool to determine if a <br /> COPC can attenuate in the soil column as leachate and then further be attenuated by dilution and mixing <br /> in groundwater. Assumptions include: 1) there is no longer a source even though landfills are not lined, <br /> 2) the one slug of leachate does not increase/accumulate as it travels to depth through the vadose zon, <br /> and 3) the vadose zone is 21 feet thick based on Confining Unit 1 (a.k.a. shallow water-bearing zone <br /> Page B-26 of Appendix B states that, "the top of the shallow water-bearing zone beneath NCTS, <br /> Stockton(4 to 6 feet bgs)." This information is substantiated by Table 2.6, which shows groundwatc. <br /> elevations for each screened interval. In this regard, there is no attenuative capacity between <br /> contaminated soil and groundwater. <br /> r- <br />