My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FYFFE
>
305
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009011
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2020 3:01:33 PM
Creation date
5/19/2020 1:47:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0009011
PE
2954
FACILITY_ID
FA0004080
FACILITY_NAME
NAVCOMSTA
STREET_NUMBER
305
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
FYFFE
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
952035000
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
305 W FYFFE ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TSok
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
276
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Al Jesena - 10 - 1 March 2000 <br /> Draft RI for OU#3 <br /> NCTS, Stockton <br /> can the Navy surmise that there is no longer a source because of the age of the landfills. We <br /> conclude that age has no relevance in this regard. The Navy should refrain from making <br /> conclusions based on the models when actual field data is contradictory. If there is no field data to <br /> support modeling assumptions/conclusions, then the Navy should propose sampling and <br /> monitoring procedures to verify their predictions. <br /> Additional Comments <br /> We recommend that the entire document be organized according to each site. All the tables, maps, <br /> investigation history and conclusions should be organized together in one location. This reorganization <br /> will make it easier to review by the responsible agencies. Furthermore, throughout the document the <br /> Navy makes conclusive statements in management goal sections (i.e., Goal GM-8), which are <br /> contradictory to the Recommendations summary at the end of each site discussion. The Navy should <br /> provide recommendations after each management goal for clarification and easier review by the <br /> responsible parties. The Recommendation section should consolidate conclusions and describe <br /> additional data gaps in support of their assumptions. All assumptions made by the Navy in support of <br /> modeling efforts or conclusions for no further action should be supported by actual verification sampling <br /> and monitoring at each site (i.e., additional soil sampling, discrete groundwater and surface water <br /> sampling, and sediment sampling). <br /> There are numerous major issues that must be resolved in the revised Draft RI Report for OU 43 landfill <br /> sites. If the Navy does not adequately address our concerns we may issue a Cleanup and Abatement <br /> Order under Water Code Section 13304. <br /> We propose that the State (i.e., DTSC, RWQCB, CDF&G) and TTEMI initiate technical meetings in <br /> Sacramento to address these issues. We believe that, in the end, this will save time and money during <br /> the RI phase of the project. <br /> If you have any questions please contact me at(916) 255-3078 or schwabk(a rb5s.swrcb.ca.gov. <br /> /�Vc�l— <br /> Kim A. Schwab <br /> Associate Engineering Geologist <br /> Enclosure(s) <br /> cc: Mr. Randy Adams, Region 1, DTSC <br /> Mr. Ron Rowe, San Joaquin Environmental Health Dept., Stockton <br /> Mr. Scott Flint, Dept. of Fish and Game, Sacramento <br /> Mr. Brad Beeman, NCTS, Stockton <br /> Mr. Jay Jahangiri, Port of Stockton <br /> Ms. Christine Baumgardt, Luce, Forward, Hamilton and Scripps, San Diego <br /> KAS:\CTS Draft R1 OU3.1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.