My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012624
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SCOTTS
>
1033
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545679
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012624
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2020 12:14:06 PM
Creation date
5/20/2020 11:50:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012624
RECORD_ID
PR0545679
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005644
FACILITY_NAME
ATCHISON TOPEKA & SANTA FE RR*
STREET_NUMBER
1033
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
SCOTTS
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1033 E SCOTTS AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
410
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OWN <br /> Boring 06. (Boring # 6 was terminated adepth <br /> o deota avoid possible <br /> f 35 feet without <br /> obtaining a clean bottom-of-the-hole sample i <br /> contamination of groundwater.) In samples where oil was visible, <br /> detections were as highppm <br /> The verticaxtent of the contarc'.nation can be estimated from <br /> Figure 1-5. Although groundwater was not ;.countered, it is l e <br /> probably only a few feet below the deepest borings. Since the bottom- <br /> of-the-hole. sample in Boring 6 was found to be contaminated, some <br /> oil may have impacted the groundwater. <br /> Tine horizontal extent of the contamination can be roughly estimated <br /> from the analytical results if movement of the oil has been <br /> predominantly downward. Borings 1, 2, and 8 encountered no <br /> contaminated soil on the north and west sides of the sampling site. <br /> These findings suggest that lateral movement of the oil has been <br /> limited. In addition, the deepest contaminated soil (Boring 6) was <br /> found directly below one of the tanks where the highest concentration <br /> of TPHs were found in the previous suggests thatinvestigation. <br /> ateral movement of <br /> obtained during this investigation sugg <br /> the oil would be greater in one direction than in any another. Thus, <br /> plymuch <br /> the lateral extent of the contaminantThesme bo ngsomay haextenve been <br /> beyond the other perimeter borings. <br /> closer to the leaks in the tanks, or the tanks may have been closer to <br /> the eastern most borings than previous drawings indicated. <br /> R.EMEDL4L ACTION <br /> An esianated 1000 to 2000 cubic yards of sail have been affected by the <br /> petroleum product from the former tanks. This soil will have to be <br /> remediated. Since groundwater was not,encountered this <br /> investigation, it is not certain whether the product in the soil has <br /> impacted the groundwater. It is important to determine if, and to <br /> what extent the groundwater has been impacted before proceeding <br /> effort. If the groundwater has not yet been <br /> with any soil remedial <br /> mpacted, then measures to prevent groundwater impact will a :oil <br /> ian <br /> - essential component of the soil remediation. If,product from the <br /> hed the groundwater, <br /> has reacthen groundwater remediation may <br /> also be necessary in conjunction with sail remediation efforts. <br /> 1-11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.