Laserfiche WebLink
James Langston 3- March 14, 2008 <br /> Clam No. 367 I <br /> I <br /> B. In-Situ Soil/ Groundwater Remediation: <br /> i <br /> METHOD: dual phase extraction ! <br /> DURATION: pending <br /> C. Groundwater Trends: <br /> Benzene trends are shown below <br /> Claim 367 <br /> i <br /> 300 <br /> 250 <br /> 200 <br /> c 150 tMW-1 - <br /> d. <br /> N . .100 <br /> m 50 <br /> 0 <br /> . .03 00 O� Oa Off` O� O� O� Oh OrO 06 <br /> Time <br /> VII: SENSITIVE RECEPTOR SURVEY: no wells identified within '/z mile of the site <br /> VIII. COMMENTS.AND JUSTIFICATION FOR RECOMMENDED ACTION <br /> A. Site Description: former retail gasoline station <br /> B. Site History: the extent of groundwater contamination is defined <br /> C. Groundwater Monitoring Summary: strong.monitoring history <br /> D. Remediation Summary: dual phase extraction is pending <br /> E: Contaminant.Exposure Pathway Evaluation: unknown <br /> F.Recommendation;The Fund recommends that the San Joaquin-County LOP- r. <br /> Cdirect the Responsible Party to,implement_active remediation without delay: The <br /> Fund will review this site next year to track progress. <br /> Kirk Larson, P.G. Date Robert Trommer, C.H.G. Date <br /> Technical Review Unit Chief, Technical Review Unit <br /> (916) 341-5663 (916) 341-5684 <br /> California EnvironmentalProtection Agency <br /> ea Reeyded Paper - <br />