Laserfiche WebLink
U U <br /> James Langston -3- January 10, 2011 <br /> Claim No. 367 <br /> C. Groundwater Trends: Benzene trends are shown below, source area and down <br /> gradient, respectively. <br /> BENZENEResults for NA <br /> ,so <br /> 140 <br /> 120 <br /> —� <br /> Aa7-- <br /> 7'i 4 <br /> -0 <br /> • ' ^� °' " „ate; s' <br /> r�.c BENZENEI %�I ' <br /> BENZENE Results for MW6 <br /> f <br /> 0.8 - - I <br /> H 0.5� -J— : <br /> ot 0.4 <br /> 0.3 ll _ <br /> 01, <br /> 0.2 <br /> o= <br /> s <br /> BENZENE III <br /> Y <br /> VII. COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION FOR RECOMMENDED ACTION <br /> A. Site Description: former retail gasoline station, empty lot <br /> B. Site History: the extent of groundwater contamination is defined <br /> C. Groundwater Monitoring Summary:. strong monitoring history <br /> D. Remediation Summary: oxygen injection is pending <br /> E. Contaminant Exposure Pathway Evaluation: according to GeoTracker, no risk <br /> assessment has been conducted, though the site is currently an empty lot. <br /> California Environments/ProtecBon Agency <br /> ; <br /> QcjRecyc/edPaper i <br />