Laserfiche WebLink
A James Langston <br /> ..� _g_ February 25, 2010 <br /> Claim No. 367 <br /> B. In-Situ Soil/ Groundwater Remediation: <br /> METHOD: oxygen injection feasibility study <br /> 4 0 DURATION: pending' <br /> li C. Groundwater Trends: <br /> y <br /> Benzene trends are shown below, source area <br /> BENZENE Results for DP E2 <br /> 350 <br /> l <br /> t <br /> 300 r ,� <br /> � I <br /> c 250 <br /> 700 <br /> 1 S <br /> n rte, € A 3 4 pP <br /> � s , <br /> VII. SENSITIVE RECEPTOR SURVEY: no wells identified within 7/z mile of the site <br /> VIII. COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION FOR RECOMMENDED ACTION <br /> A. Site Description: former retail gasoline station <br /> B. Site History: the extent of groundwater contamination is defined <br /> C. Groundwater Monitoring Summary: strong monitoring history <br /> D. Remediation Summary: oxygen injection is pending <br /> E. Contaminant Exposure Pathway Evaluation: unknown <br /> F. Recommendation: <br /> In March 2008, the Fund made the following recommendation: The Fund <br /> recommends the Responsible Party implement active remediation without delay. <br /> The Fund will review this site next year to track progress. <br /> UPDATED, March 2009: By letter on 13 May 2008, the San Joaquin County. <br /> LOP.directed the Responsible Party to implement dual phase extraction. The <br /> Fund concurs and recommends that active remediation begin without <br /> unnecessary delay. The Fund.will review this site next year to track progress. <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> AZJ'RecyckdF pe, <br />